Abstract
This paper tests the ability of different reservoir operation models to represent a relatively simple water rationing policy through a multi-year simulation of the Upper Krishna River Basin in India. The tested policies involve reductions in water demand as a function of storage levels. The models that were tested include Mike Hydro Basin, the Water Evaluation and Planning (WEAP) model, the HEC-ResSIM model, and the WEB.BM model. Other vendors who tested their models subsequently declined participation in this publication. The models utilized single-time step progression and assumed steady-state flows, implying an expectation of similar solutions among the models. The results show that Mike Hydro Basin and HEC-ResSIM fail to allocate water according to the prescribed rules. The paper provides a problem description and downloadable input and output data. Modelling practitioners can test the performance of their models by using the benchmark solution presented in this paper.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 765-783 |
| Number of pages | 19 |
| Journal | Hydrological Sciences Journal |
| Volume | 71 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 2026 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- linear programming
- reservoir operation
- simulation
- water rationing policies
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'A benchmark test problem for reservoir simulation models and comparison of their results'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver