Abstract
We evaluate the performance of different distribution mapping techniques for bias correction of climate model output by operating on synthetic data and comparing the results to an “oracle” correction based on perfect knowledge of the generating distributions. We find results consistent across six different metrics of performance. Techniques based on fitting a distribution perform best on data from normal and gamma distributions, but are at a significant disadvantage when the data does not come from a known parametric distribution. The technique with the best overall performance is a novel nonparametric technique, kernel density distribution mapping (KDDM).
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Machine Learning and Data Mining Approaches to Climate Science |
| Editors | Valliappa Lakshmanan, Eric Gilleland, Amy McGovern, Martin Tingley |
| Place of Publication | Cham |
| Publisher | Springer International Publishing |
| Pages | 91-99 |
| Number of pages | 9 |
| ISBN (Print) | 9783319172200 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 2015 |
Keywords
- KDDM
- Nonparametric distribution
- Oracle evaluation
- Quantile mapping
- Transfer function