TY - JOUR
T1 - A review on regional convection-permitting climate modeling
T2 - Demonstrations, prospects, and challenges
AU - Prein, Andreas F.
AU - Langhans, Wolfgang
AU - Fosser, Giorgia
AU - Ferrone, Andrew
AU - Ban, Nikolina
AU - Goergen, Klaus
AU - Keller, Michael
AU - Tölle, Merja
AU - Gutjahr, Oliver
AU - Feser, Frauke
AU - Brisson, Erwan
AU - Kollet, Stefan
AU - Schmidli, Juerg
AU - Van Lipzig, Nicole P.M.
AU - Leung, Ruby
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2015. The Authors.
PY - 2015/6/1
Y1 - 2015/6/1
N2 - Regional climate modeling using convection-permitting models (CPMs; horizontal grid spacing <4km) emerges as a promising framework to provide more reliable climate information on regional to local scales compared to traditionally used large-scale models (LSMs; horizontal grid spacing >10km). CPMs no longer rely on convection parameterization schemes, which had been identified as a major source of errors and uncertainties in LSMs. Moreover, CPMs allow for a more accurate representation of surface and orography fields. The drawback of CPMs is the high demand on computational resources. For this reason, first CPM climate simulations only appeared a decade ago. In this study, we aim to provide a common basis for CPM climate simulations by giving a holistic review of the topic. The most important components in CPMs such as physical parameterizations and dynamical formulations are discussed critically. An overview of weaknesses and an outlook on required future developments is provided. Most importantly, this review presents the consolidated outcome of studies that addressed the added value of CPM climate simulations compared to LSMs. Improvements are evident mostly for climate statistics related to deep convection, mountainous regions, or extreme events. The climate change signals of CPM simulations suggest an increase in flash floods, changes in hail storm characteristics, and reductions in the snowpack over mountains. In conclusion, CPMs are a very promising tool for future climate research. However, coordinated modeling programs are crucially needed to advance parameterizations of unresolved physics and to assess the full potential of CPMs.
AB - Regional climate modeling using convection-permitting models (CPMs; horizontal grid spacing <4km) emerges as a promising framework to provide more reliable climate information on regional to local scales compared to traditionally used large-scale models (LSMs; horizontal grid spacing >10km). CPMs no longer rely on convection parameterization schemes, which had been identified as a major source of errors and uncertainties in LSMs. Moreover, CPMs allow for a more accurate representation of surface and orography fields. The drawback of CPMs is the high demand on computational resources. For this reason, first CPM climate simulations only appeared a decade ago. In this study, we aim to provide a common basis for CPM climate simulations by giving a holistic review of the topic. The most important components in CPMs such as physical parameterizations and dynamical formulations are discussed critically. An overview of weaknesses and an outlook on required future developments is provided. Most importantly, this review presents the consolidated outcome of studies that addressed the added value of CPM climate simulations compared to LSMs. Improvements are evident mostly for climate statistics related to deep convection, mountainous regions, or extreme events. The climate change signals of CPM simulations suggest an increase in flash floods, changes in hail storm characteristics, and reductions in the snowpack over mountains. In conclusion, CPMs are a very promising tool for future climate research. However, coordinated modeling programs are crucially needed to advance parameterizations of unresolved physics and to assess the full potential of CPMs.
KW - added value
KW - climate
KW - cloud resolving
KW - convection-permitting modeling
KW - high resolution
KW - nonhydrostatic modeling
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/84937516623
U2 - 10.1002/2014RG000475
DO - 10.1002/2014RG000475
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:84937516623
SN - 8755-1209
VL - 53
SP - 323
EP - 361
JO - Reviews of Geophysics
JF - Reviews of Geophysics
IS - 2
ER -