Abstract
Global ionospheric models typically rely on parameterizations to account for heating of the plasma by photoelectrons. We compare the most commonly used parameterization to a rigorous photoelectron model and find the parameterization under-predicts the thermal electron volume heating rate by 20-30% under nominal solar conditions. When applied to a large solar flare, the parameterized heating rate is more than an order of magnitude smaller than the peak rate calculated with the physical model. To remedy this, we develop a new parameterization of electron heating that eliminates these differences; the resulting heating rates are within 5-15% of the physical model for nominal and solar flare conditions. The new algorithm is incorporated into a 1-D Global Average Ionosphere/Thermosphere (GAIT) model and used to investigate the response to the X17 flare of 28 October 2003. Electron temperatures calculated with the new parameterization are up to 10% higher prior to the flare, and 15% higher at the flare peak. The revised parameterization also leads to a 2% increase in neutral exospheric temperatures in the coupled model. The flare response of the global-average thermosphere is described and found to be similar to the satellite drag results reported by Sutton et al.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | A08307 |
| Journal | Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics |
| Volume | 113 |
| Issue number | 8 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Aug 1 2008 |
| Externally published | Yes |