Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Appreciation of Peer Reviewers for 2025

  • Abdelwahid Mellouki
  • , Christian George
  • , Filippo Giorgi
  • , Gang Chen
  • , Hella Garny
  • , Manfred Wendisch
  • , Nicole Riemer
  • , Robert F. Rogers
  • , William Randel
  • , Xin Zhong Liang
  • , Xiushu Qie
  • , Yafang Cheng
  • , Yongyun Hu
  • , Yun Qian
  • Mohammed VI Polytechnic University
  • Universite Claude Bernard Lyon 1
  • Abdus Salam International Centre for Theoretical Physics
  • University of California at Los Angeles
  • German Aerospace Center
  • Leipzig University
  • University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
  • Asia-Pacific Typhoon Collaborative Research Center
  • National Center for Atmospheric Research
  • University of Maryland, College Park
  • CAS - Institute of Atmospheric Physics
  • Max Planck Institute for Chemistry
  • Peking University
  • Pacific Northwest National Laboratory

Research output: Contribution to journalEditorial

Abstract

The editorial board of Journal of Geophysical Research (JGR): Atmospheres thanks the reviewers who refereed papers in 2025. The editors and associate editors wish to sincerely thank the 3,434 outstanding scientists who dedicated their time and expertise to reviewing manuscripts for the journal in 2025. We also extend our gratitude to those who recommended reviewers and volunteered to contribute to the peer review process. Peer review is a crucial process to ensure the integrity and rigor of science. Your thoughtful and constructive reviews have helped to improve the quality of papers in the journal, stimulated new ideas, and advanced the careers of many young scientists. They contributed to the high quality of JGR: Atmospheres and the standard of science in our discipline.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere2026JD046928
JournalJournal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
Volume131
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 28 2026
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • editorial
  • peer review

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Appreciation of Peer Reviewers for 2025'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this