Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Atlantic Tropical Easterly Wave and Cyclogenesis Forecasting in the Physical and New AI Forecast Systems at ECMWF

  • Sharanya J. Majumdar
  • , Linus Magnusson
  • , Quinton A. Lawton
  • , Rebecca Emerton
  • , Simon T.K. Lang
  • , Michael Maier-Gerber
  • , David S. Richardson
  • University of Miami
  • European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts
  • ECMWF

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

ECMWF forecasts of African easterly waves and tropical cyclogenesis in the Atlantic basin are investigated during 2020–24, with a focus on Integrated Forecasting System (IFS) upgrades and the new Artificial Intelligence Forecasting System (AIFS). Ensemble-based probabilistic forecasts, valid at the time a tropical storm was named, exhibited high variability, with sensitivity to the maximum wind speed threshold. In many cases, the probabilities rose sharply when the lead time was reduced from 72 to 48 h. The average probabilities have generally increased in each year, including when the IFS ensemble grid spacing was reduced from 18 to 9 km in 2023. Across 18 developing tropical cyclones in 2024, the probabilities based on the artificial intelligence (AI)-based ensemble system [“AIFS-continuous ranked probability score (CRPS)”] often exceeded IFS probabilities for 84–120-h lead times, especially for stronger waves. In contrast, the AIFS-CRPS probabilities were lower for 36–48-h lead times, especially for the weakest waves. The average AIFS-CRPS ensemblemean position forecast error was often lower than that of the AIFS-Single, IFS deterministic, and IFS ensemble-mean forecasts. The wave locations in the control (deterministic) IFS forecasts exhibited a greater southward bias than the single AIFS forecasts (“AIFS-Single”), whereas both models exhibited a slow bias in longitude. Mean absolute errors in AIFS-Single were mostly smaller for 3–5-day forecasts of 850–500-hPa wave-relative environmental vorticity and specific humidity, withlowerbiasesinthesefields. Overall, the AIFS-CRPS ensemble and AIFS-Single forecasts serve as a useful complement to the IFS.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1181-1197
Number of pages17
JournalWeather and Forecasting
Volume41
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2026

Keywords

  • Ensembles
  • Machine learning
  • Model comparison
  • North Atlantic Ocean
  • Numerical weather prediction/forecasting
  • Tropical cyclones

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Atlantic Tropical Easterly Wave and Cyclogenesis Forecasting in the Physical and New AI Forecast Systems at ECMWF'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this