Atmospheric River Detection Under Changing Seasonality and Mean-State Climate: ARTMIP Tier 2 Paleoclimate Experiments

  • W. D. Rush
  • , J. M. Lora
  • , C. B. Skinner
  • , S. A. Menemenlis
  • , C. A. Shields
  • , P. Ullrich
  • , T. A. O’Brien
  • , S. Brands
  • , B. Guan
  • , K. S. Mattingly
  • , E. McClenny
  • , K. Nardi
  • , A. Nellikkattil
  • , A. M. Ramos
  • , K. J. Reid
  • , E. Shearer
  • , R. Tomé
  • , J. D. Wille
  • , L. R. Leung
  • , F. M. Ralph
  • J. J. Rutz, M. Wehner, Z. Zhang, M. Lu, K. T. Quagraine

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Scopus citations

Abstract

Atmospheric rivers (ARs) are filamentary structures within the atmosphere that account for a substantial portion of poleward moisture transport and play an important role in Earth's hydroclimate. However, there is no one quantitative definition for what constitutes an atmospheric river, leading to uncertainty in quantifying how these systems respond to global change. This study seeks to better understand how different AR detection tools (ARDTs) respond to changes in climate states utilizing single-forcing climate model experiments under the aegis of the Atmospheric River Tracking Method Intercomparison Project (ARTMIP). We compare a simulation with an early Holocene orbital configuration and another with CO2 levels of the Last Glacial Maximum to a preindustrial control simulation to test how the ARDTs respond to changes in seasonality and mean climate state, respectively. We find good agreement among the algorithms in the AR response to the changing orbital configuration, with a poleward shift in AR frequency that tracks seasonal poleward shifts in atmospheric water vapor and zonal winds. In the low CO2 simulation, the algorithms generally agree on the sign of AR changes, but there is substantial spread in their magnitude, indicating that mean-state changes lead to larger uncertainty. This disagreement likely arises primarily from differences between algorithms in their thresholds for water vapor and its transport used for identifying ARs. These findings warrant caution in ARDT selection for paleoclimate and climate change studies in which there is a change to the mean climate state, as ARDT selection contributes substantial uncertainty in such cases.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere2024JD042222
JournalJournal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
Volume130
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 16 2025

Keywords

  • ARTMIP
  • Holocene
  • IVT
  • atmospheric rivers
  • last glacial maximum
  • paleoclimate

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Atmospheric River Detection Under Changing Seasonality and Mean-State Climate: ARTMIP Tier 2 Paleoclimate Experiments'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this