Aviation fuel tracer simulation: Model intercomparison and implications

  • M. Y. Danilin
  • , D. W. Fahey
  • , U. Schumann
  • , M. J. Prather
  • , J. E. Penner
  • , M. K.W. Ko
  • , D. K. Weisenstein
  • , C. H. Jackman
  • , G. Pitari
  • , I. Köhler
  • , R. Sausen
  • , C. J. Weaver
  • , A. R. Douglass
  • , P. S. Connell
  • , D. E. Kinnison
  • , F. J. Dentener
  • , E. L. Fleming
  • , T. K. Berntsen
  • , I. S.A. Isaksen
  • , J. M. Haywood
  • B. Kärcher

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

49 Scopus citations

Abstract

An upper limit for aircraft-produced perturbations to aerosols and gaseous exhaust products in the upper troposphere and lower stratosphere (UT/LS) is derived using the 1992 aviation fuel tracer simulation performed by eleven global atmospheric models. Key findings are that subsonic aircraft emissions: 1) have not be responsible for the observed water vapor trends at 40°N; 2) could be a significant source of soot mass near 12 km, but not at 20 km, 3) might cause a noticeable increase in the background sulfate aerosol surface area and number densities (but not mass density) near the northern mid-latitude tropopause, and 4) could provide a global, annual mean top of the atmosphere radiative forcing up to +0.006 W/m2 and -0.013 W/m2 due to emitted soot and sulfur, respectively.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)3947-3950
Number of pages4
JournalGeophysical Research Letters
Volume25
Issue number21
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 1998

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Aviation fuel tracer simulation: Model intercomparison and implications'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this