Bootstrap methods for statistical inference. Part i: Comparative forecast verification for continuous variables

Eric Gilleland

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

26 Scopus citations

Abstract

When making statistical inferences, bootstrap resampling methods are often appealing because of less stringent assumptions about the distribution of the statistic(s) of interest. However, the procedures are not free of as-sumptions. This paper addresses a specific situation that occurs frequently in atmospheric sciences where the standard bootstrap is not appropriate: comparative forecast verification of continuous variables. In this setting, the question to be answered concerns which of two weather or climate models is better in the sense of some type of average deviation from observations. The series to be compared are generally strongly dependent, which invalidates the most basic bootstrap technique. This paper also introduces new bootstrap code from the R package ‘‘distillery’’ that facilitates easy implementation of appropriate methods for paired-difference-of-means bootstrap procedures for dependent data.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2117-2134
Number of pages18
JournalJournal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology
Volume37
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2020
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Statistical techniques
  • Statistics
  • Time series

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Bootstrap methods for statistical inference. Part i: Comparative forecast verification for continuous variables'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this