Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Bootstrap methods for statistical inference. Part i: Comparative forecast verification for continuous variables

  • Eric Gilleland

    Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

    40 Scopus citations

    Abstract

    When making statistical inferences, bootstrap resampling methods are often appealing because of less stringent assumptions about the distribution of the statistic(s) of interest. However, the procedures are not free of as-sumptions. This paper addresses a specific situation that occurs frequently in atmospheric sciences where the standard bootstrap is not appropriate: comparative forecast verification of continuous variables. In this setting, the question to be answered concerns which of two weather or climate models is better in the sense of some type of average deviation from observations. The series to be compared are generally strongly dependent, which invalidates the most basic bootstrap technique. This paper also introduces new bootstrap code from the R package ‘‘distillery’’ that facilitates easy implementation of appropriate methods for paired-difference-of-means bootstrap procedures for dependent data.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)2117-2134
    Number of pages18
    JournalJournal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology
    Volume37
    Issue number11
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Nov 2020

    Keywords

    • Statistical techniques
    • Statistics
    • Time series

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Bootstrap methods for statistical inference. Part i: Comparative forecast verification for continuous variables'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this