Can atomic oxygen production explain the ionospheric annual asymmetry?

Jiuhou Lei, Wenbin Wang, Alan G. Burns, Xiaoli Luan, Xiankang Dou

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

18 Scopus citations

Abstract

The causes of the ionospheric annual asymmetry, which refers to a larger averaged electron density at geomagnetic conjugate latitudes in December than in June, remain an unresolved problem that still generates considerable interest. The ionospheric annual asymmetry in the peak electron density of the F2 layer (NmF2) is typically 20–40%, which cannot be explained by the 7% annual asymmetry in photoionization caused by the shorter Sun-Earth distance in December. Mikhailov and Perrone (2011, 2015) suggested that the annual asymmetry in atomic oxygen production due to O2 dissociation is sufficient to explain the ionospheric annual asymmetry at middle latitudes. In our study, a series of the Global Mean Model (GMM) simulations have been conducted to test this hypothesis. Although O2 dissociation and eddy diffusion processes are included in the GMM, the simulated annual asymmetry of NmF2 is only 13%. Furthermore, the annual asymmetry increase in neutral composition in our GMM simulations can only explain about one fifth of the ionospheric annual asymmetry. Therefore, the atomic oxygen production mechanism is unlikely to be a major contributor to the ionospheric annual asymmetry.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)7238-7244
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics
Volume121
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2016

Keywords

  • Sun-Earth distance
  • annual asymmetry
  • atomic oxygen production

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Can atomic oxygen production explain the ionospheric annual asymmetry?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this