Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Causes and consequences of Arctic amplification elucidated by coordinated multimodel experiments

  • James A. Screen
  • , Alexandre Audette
  • , Russell Blackport
  • , Clara Deser
  • , Mark England
  • , Nicole Feldl
  • , Melissa Gervais
  • , Stephanie Hay
  • , Paul J. Kushner
  • , Yu Chiao Liang
  • , Rym Msadek
  • , Regan Mudhar
  • , Michael Sigmond
  • , Doug Smith
  • , Lantao Sun
  • , Hao Yu
  • University of Exeter
  • University of California at Santa Cruz
  • Université Laval and Environment and Climate Change Canada
  • National Center for Atmospheric Research
  • Pennsylvania State University
  • University of Toronto
  • National Taiwan University
  • Paul Sabatier University
  • Met Office
  • Colorado State University

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

Human-induced warming is amplified in the Arctic, but its causes and consequences are not precisely known. Here, we review scientific advances facilitated by the Polar Amplification Model Intercomparison Project. Surface heat flux changes and feedbacks triggered by sea-ice loss are critical to explain the magnitude and seasonality of Arctic amplification. Tropospheric responses to Arctic sea-ice loss that are robust across models and separable from internal variability have been revealed, including local warming and moistening, equatorward shifts of the jet stream and storm track in the North Atlantic, and fewer and milder cold extremes over North America. Whilst generally small compared to simulated internal variability, the response to Arctic sea-ice loss comprises a non-negligible contribution to projected climate change. For example, Arctic sea-ice loss is essential to explain projected North Atlantic jet trends and their uncertainty. Model diversity in the simulated responses has provided pathways to observationally constrain the real-world response.

Original languageEnglish
Article number23
Number of pages12
JournalCommunications Earth and Environment
Volume7
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 6 2025
Externally publishedYes

Funding

Matt Jenkins is thanked for providing Fig. 2. We thank the modelling groups that have contributed to the PAMIP, and the Earth System Grid Federation (https://esgf.github.io) for providing the infrastructure for data storage and sharing. This work used JASMIN, the UK's collaborative data analysis environment (https://www.jasmin.ac.uk). J.A.S. and S.H. were supported by the NERC ArctiCONNECT project (NE/V005855/1). C.D. was supported by the National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR), which is sponsored by the National Science Foundation under Cooperative Agreement 1852977. M.E. was supported by the Royal Commission for the Exhibition of 1851 research fellowship. N.F. was supported by NSF Grant AGS-1753034. P.K. acknowledges support from the grant NSF PHY-2309135 to the Kavli Institute for Theoretical Physics (KITP). Y.-C.L. was supported by the National Science and Technology Council (113-2628-M-002-018 and 113-2116-M-008-024). R.M. is funded by a NERC GW4+ Doctoral Training Partnership studentship (NE/S007504/1). D.S. was supported by the Met Office Hadley Centre Climate Programme funded by DSIT. L.S. was supported by NSF Grant AGS-2300038. H.Y. was supported by the Chinese Scholarship Council. We thank three anonymous reviewers for their constructive feedback.

FundersFunder number
RCUK | Natural Environment Research Council (NERC)NE/V005855/1

    Keywords

    • Sea-ice loss
    • Atmospheric response
    • Polar amplification
    • Minimal influence
    • Jet-stream
    • Models
    • Robust

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Causes and consequences of Arctic amplification elucidated by coordinated multimodel experiments'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this