Comments on “Poststorm Thermospheric NO Overcooling?” by Mikhailov and Perrone (2020)

Jiuhou Lei, Wenbin Wang, Alan G. Burns, Shun Rong Zhang, Tong Dang

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debate

3 Scopus citations

Abstract

Recently Mikhailov and Perrone (2020, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019ja027122) proposed the mechanism of neutral atomic oxygen reduction, which is associated with the upper atmospheric circulation, to explain the reduction of total thermospheric mass density during the storm recovery phase. The authors further concluded arbitrarily that there is no need to introduce the storm-time overcooling concept. However, their methodology is fundamentally flawed and their results and conclusions are incorrect. Instead, the overcooling scenario remains a viable concept in understanding thermospheric variations in the storm recovery phase.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere2020JA027992
JournalJournal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics
Volume126
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2021

Keywords

  • recovery phase
  • storm
  • thermospheric overcooling

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comments on “Poststorm Thermospheric NO Overcooling?” by Mikhailov and Perrone (2020)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this