Comparison between non-orographic gravity-wave parameterizations used in QBOi models and Strateole 2 constant-level balloons

  • F. Lott
  • , R. Rani
  • , C. McLandress
  • , A. Podglajen
  • , A. Bushell
  • , M. Bramberger
  • , H. K. Lee
  • , J. Alexander
  • , J. Anstey
  • , H. Y. Chun
  • , A. Hertzog
  • , N. Butchart
  • , Y. H. Kim
  • , Y. Kawatani
  • , B. Legras
  • , E. Manzini
  • , H. Naoe
  • , S. Osprey
  • , R. Plougonven
  • , H. Pohlmann
  • J. H. Richter, J. Scinocca, J. García-Serrano, F. Serva, T. Stockdale, S. Versick, S. Watanabe, K. Yoshida

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

5 Scopus citations

Abstract

Gravity-wave (GW) parameterizations from 12 general circulation models (GCMs) participating in the Quasi-Biennial Oscillation initiative (QBOi) are compared with Strateole 2 balloon observations made in the tropical lower stratosphere from November 2019–February 2020 (phase 1) and from October 2021–January 2022 (phase 2). The parameterizations employ the three standard techniques used in GCMs to represent subgrid-scale non-orographic GWs, namely the two globally spectral techniques developed by Warner and McIntyre (1999) and Hines (1997), as well as the “multiwaves” approaches following the work of Lindzen (1981). The input meteorological fields necessary to run the parameterizations offline are extracted from the ERA5 reanalysis and correspond to the meteorological conditions found underneath the balloons. In general, there is fair agreement between amplitudes derived from measurements for waves with periods less than (Formula presented.) h and parameterizations. The correlation between the daily observations and the corresponding results of the parameterization can be around 0.4, which is (Formula presented.) significant, since 1200 days of observations are used. Given that the parameterizations have only been tuned to produce a quasi-biennial oscillation (QBO) in the models, the 0.4 correlation coefficient of the GW momentum fluxes is surprisingly good. These correlations nevertheless vary between schemes and depend little on their formulation (globally spectral versus multiwaves for instance). We therefore attribute these correlations to dynamical filtering, which all schemes take into account, whereas only a few relate the gravity waves to their sources. Statistically significant correlations are mostly found for eastward-propagating waves, which may be due to the fact that during both Strateole 2 phases the QBO is easterly at the altitude of the balloon flights. We also found that the probability density functions (pdfs) of the momentum fluxes are represented better in spectral schemes with constant sources than in schemes (“spectral” or “multiwaves”) that relate GWs only to their convective sources.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)3721-3736
Number of pages16
JournalQuarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society
Volume150
Issue number763
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2024
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • balloon observations
  • global climate models
  • gravity waves
  • quasi-biennial oscillation

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison between non-orographic gravity-wave parameterizations used in QBOi models and Strateole 2 constant-level balloons'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this