TY - JOUR
T1 - Comparison of Eddy Dissipation Rate Estimated From Operational Radiosonde and Commercial Aircraft Observations in the United States
AU - Ko, Han Chang
AU - Chun, Hye Yeong
AU - Sharman, Robert D.
AU - Kim, Jung Hoon
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023. The Authors.
PY - 2023/10/27
Y1 - 2023/10/27
N2 - The one-third power of the energy dissipation rate (EDR), a primary aviation turbulence metric, is calculated using high vertical-resolution radiosonde data (HVRRD) and compared with flight-EDR observed from commercial airlines. Comparisons are made along the main flight routes over the United States and at z = 20–45 kft for 6 years (2012–2017). The horizontal distributions of moderate-or-greater (MOG) ratio of HVRRD-EDR show large values over the Rocky Mountains, consistent with those of flight-EDR. Vertically, the MOG ratios of HVRRD-EDR show local peaks at z = 20–23 kft and 41–44 kft, while those of flight-EDR at z = 23–26 kft and 35–41 kft. Temporally, HVRRD-EDR has maximum MOG values in JJA and minimum values in DJF at z = 20–30 kft, which is opposite to the flight-EDR. At z = 30–40 kft, HVRRD-EDR shows nearly no seasonal variation but flight-EDR has large values in MAM and small values in JJA. At z = 40–45 kft, HVRRD-EDR (flight-EDR) shows large values in MAM and small values in SON (DJF). Discrepancies in spatiotemporal distributions between the two data sets likely stem from: (a) turbulence observed from the two data sets cannot be the same event, (b) the limitation of HVRRD-EDR in capturing shear-instability under statically stable condition (i.e., Kelvin-Helmholtz instability) which probably accounts for most flight-EDR events at upper levels, and (c) limitation in aircraft measurements response to fluctuations at smaller scales than the aircraft size.
AB - The one-third power of the energy dissipation rate (EDR), a primary aviation turbulence metric, is calculated using high vertical-resolution radiosonde data (HVRRD) and compared with flight-EDR observed from commercial airlines. Comparisons are made along the main flight routes over the United States and at z = 20–45 kft for 6 years (2012–2017). The horizontal distributions of moderate-or-greater (MOG) ratio of HVRRD-EDR show large values over the Rocky Mountains, consistent with those of flight-EDR. Vertically, the MOG ratios of HVRRD-EDR show local peaks at z = 20–23 kft and 41–44 kft, while those of flight-EDR at z = 23–26 kft and 35–41 kft. Temporally, HVRRD-EDR has maximum MOG values in JJA and minimum values in DJF at z = 20–30 kft, which is opposite to the flight-EDR. At z = 30–40 kft, HVRRD-EDR shows nearly no seasonal variation but flight-EDR has large values in MAM and small values in JJA. At z = 40–45 kft, HVRRD-EDR (flight-EDR) shows large values in MAM and small values in SON (DJF). Discrepancies in spatiotemporal distributions between the two data sets likely stem from: (a) turbulence observed from the two data sets cannot be the same event, (b) the limitation of HVRRD-EDR in capturing shear-instability under statically stable condition (i.e., Kelvin-Helmholtz instability) which probably accounts for most flight-EDR events at upper levels, and (c) limitation in aircraft measurements response to fluctuations at smaller scales than the aircraft size.
KW - Thorpe method
KW - aviation turbulence
KW - energy dissipation rate
KW - high vertical-resolution radiosonde data
KW - in situ flight EDR
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85174921650
U2 - 10.1029/2023JD039352
DO - 10.1029/2023JD039352
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85174921650
SN - 2169-897X
VL - 128
JO - Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
JF - Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
IS - 20
M1 - e2023JD039352
ER -