TY - JOUR
T1 - Comparison of spaced-antenna baseline wind estimators
T2 - Theoretical and simulated results
AU - Doviak, Richard J.
AU - Zhang, Guifu
AU - Cohn, Stephen A.
AU - Brown, William O.J.
PY - 2004
Y1 - 2004
N2 - Formulas for the theoretical precision of cross-beam winds measured with spaced-antenna profilers are developed and compared with results obtained from simulations for conditions of high signal-to-noise-ratios. These formulas relate the precision of wind measurement to radar and atmospheric parameters. Formulas for Briggs' Full Correlation Analysis, the Intersection method, and the Slope-at-Zero-Lag method are each presented for two implementations-estimating parameters for assumed Gaussian shaped correlation functions, and a direct finite difference method where this assumption is not necessary. For each wind measurement method and implementation, these formulas are used to evaluate, as an example, the theoretical performance of MAPR, NCAR's 915 MHz, Multiple Antenna Profiling Radar. The theory is also compared with the standard error obtained from simulations presented by Kawano et al. [2002] for the MU radar in Shigaraki, Japan. Comparisons show that Intersection and Briggs' FCA methods are identical and provide the best performance.
AB - Formulas for the theoretical precision of cross-beam winds measured with spaced-antenna profilers are developed and compared with results obtained from simulations for conditions of high signal-to-noise-ratios. These formulas relate the precision of wind measurement to radar and atmospheric parameters. Formulas for Briggs' Full Correlation Analysis, the Intersection method, and the Slope-at-Zero-Lag method are each presented for two implementations-estimating parameters for assumed Gaussian shaped correlation functions, and a direct finite difference method where this assumption is not necessary. For each wind measurement method and implementation, these formulas are used to evaluate, as an example, the theoretical performance of MAPR, NCAR's 915 MHz, Multiple Antenna Profiling Radar. The theory is also compared with the standard error obtained from simulations presented by Kawano et al. [2002] for the MU radar in Shigaraki, Japan. Comparisons show that Intersection and Briggs' FCA methods are identical and provide the best performance.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/1942506762
U2 - 10.1029/2003rs002931
DO - 10.1029/2003rs002931
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:1942506762
SN - 0048-6604
VL - 39
SP - 48
EP - 68
JO - Radio Science
JF - Radio Science
IS - 1
ER -