Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Comparisons of observed and forward modeled Balmer-α intensities from WACCM-X and MSIS-00

  • Lauren T. Ashworth
  • , Edwin J. Mierkiewicz
  • , Susan M. Nossal
  • , Liying Qian
  • , Joseph M. McInerney
  • , L. Matthew Haffner
  • , R. Carey Woodward
  • , Brandon J. Myers
  • Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University
  • University of Wisconsin-Madison
  • National Center for Atmospheric Research

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

From 2000 to 2001, ground-based geocoronal hydrogen Balmer-(Formula presented) (H(Formula presented)) observations were obtained from Pine Bluff Observatory (PBO) in Wisconsin (43.07(Formula presented)N, 270.33(Formula presented)E) using a high spectral resolution (R (Formula presented) 80, 000) Fabry-Perot interferometer (FPI). In previous work, the PBO March 2000 observations have been compared to forward modeled MSISE-90 H(Formula presented) intensities using the radiative transport code, lyao_rt (Bishop, Journal of Qunatitative Spectroscopy and Radiative Transfer, 1999, 61, 473–491). Results indicate that hydrogen column abundances exceed those predicted by MSISE-90 (Bishop et al., Journal of Geophysical Research, 2004, 109, 473–491). Furthermore, the PBO 2000–2001 observations have been compared to NRLMSISE-00 (MSIS-00) H(Formula presented) intensities generated by lyao_rt. It was found that the observed dusk-to-dawn intensity variation and MSIS-00 show good agreement near the equinoxes and summer solstice, however, MSIS-00 underestimates the dusk-to-dawn asymmetry near the winter solstice (Gallant et al., Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, 2019, 124, 4525–4538). More recent work has focused on forward modeling Whole Atmosphere Community Climate Model-eXtended (WACCM-X) simulations for three separate observatory locations, including PBO. Here, we investigate variations in upper thermospheric hydrogen by comparing WACCM-X and MSIS-00 forward modeled H(Formula presented) intensities for the March equinox with the PBO March 2000 evening observations used in Bishop et al. (Journal of Geophysical Research, 2004, 109, 473–491). WACCM-X underestimates the March 2000 observations by less than a factor of 2.0 rayleighs whereas MSIS-00 underestimates the observations by 2.6 rayleighs. A further analysis suggests that WACCM-X is better at simulating the underlying hydrogen density distribution than MSIS-00. Model-model-data comparisons between the 2000–2001 PBO observations, MSIS-00, and WACCM-X simulations that are representative of the observational conditions are currently underway.

Original languageEnglish
Article number1643505
JournalFrontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences
Volume13
DOIs
StatePublished - 2026
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Balmer-α
  • Fabry-Perot interferometer
  • MSIS-00
  • WACCM-X
  • forward modeling
  • geocoronal hydrogen

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparisons of observed and forward modeled Balmer-α intensities from WACCM-X and MSIS-00'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this