TY - JOUR
T1 - DCMIP2016
T2 - A review of non-hydrostatic dynamical core design and intercomparison of participating models
AU - Ullrich, Paul A.
AU - Jablonowski, Christiane
AU - Kent, James
AU - Lauritzen, Peter H.
AU - Nair, Ramachandran
AU - Reed, Kevin A.
AU - Zarzycki, Colin M.
AU - Hall, David M.
AU - Dazlich, Don
AU - Heikes, Ross
AU - Konor, Celal
AU - Randall, David
AU - Dubos, Thomas
AU - Meurdesoif, Yann
AU - Chen, Xi
AU - Harris, Lucas
AU - Kühnlein, Christian
AU - Lee, Vivian
AU - Qaddouri, Abdessamad
AU - Girard, Claude
AU - Giorgetta, Marco
AU - Reinert, Daniel
AU - Klemp, Joseph
AU - Park, Sang Hun
AU - Skamarock, William
AU - Miura, Hiroaki
AU - Ohno, Tomoki
AU - Yoshida, Ryuji
AU - Walko, Robert
AU - Reinecke, Alex
AU - Viner, Kevin
PY - 2017/12/6
Y1 - 2017/12/6
N2 - Atmospheric dynamical cores are a fundamental component of global atmospheric modeling systems and are responsible for capturing the dynamical behavior of the Earth's atmosphere via numerical integration of the Navier-Stokes equations. These systems have existed in one form or another for over half of a century, with the earliest discretizations having now evolved into a complex ecosystem of algorithms and computational strategies. In essence, no two dynamical cores are alike, and their individual successes suggest that no perfect model exists. To better understand modern dynamical cores, this paper aims to provide a comprehensive review of 11 non-hydrostatic dynamical cores, drawn from modeling centers and groups that participated in the 2016 Dynamical Core Model Intercomparison Project (DCMIP) workshop and summer school. This review includes a choice of model grid, variable placement, vertical coordinate, prognostic equations, temporal discretization, and the diffusion, stabilization, filters, and fixers employed by each system.
AB - Atmospheric dynamical cores are a fundamental component of global atmospheric modeling systems and are responsible for capturing the dynamical behavior of the Earth's atmosphere via numerical integration of the Navier-Stokes equations. These systems have existed in one form or another for over half of a century, with the earliest discretizations having now evolved into a complex ecosystem of algorithms and computational strategies. In essence, no two dynamical cores are alike, and their individual successes suggest that no perfect model exists. To better understand modern dynamical cores, this paper aims to provide a comprehensive review of 11 non-hydrostatic dynamical cores, drawn from modeling centers and groups that participated in the 2016 Dynamical Core Model Intercomparison Project (DCMIP) workshop and summer school. This review includes a choice of model grid, variable placement, vertical coordinate, prognostic equations, temporal discretization, and the diffusion, stabilization, filters, and fixers employed by each system.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85037726783
U2 - 10.5194/gmd-10-4477-2017
DO - 10.5194/gmd-10-4477-2017
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85037726783
SN - 1991-959X
VL - 10
SP - 4477
EP - 4509
JO - Geoscientific Model Development
JF - Geoscientific Model Development
IS - 12
ER -