Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

DCMIP2016: The splitting supercell test case

  • Colin M. Zarzycki
  • , Christiane Jablonowski
  • , James Kent
  • , Peter H. Lauritzen
  • , Ramachandran Nair
  • , Kevin A. Reed
  • , Paul A. Ullrich
  • , David M. Hall
  • , Mark A. Taylor
  • , Don Dazlich
  • , Ross Heikes
  • , Celal Konor
  • , David Randall
  • , Xi Chen
  • , Lucas Harris
  • , Marco Giorgetta
  • , Daniel Reinert
  • , Christian Kühnlein
  • , Robert Walko
  • , Vivian Lee
  • Abdessamad Qaddouri, Monique Tanguay, Hiroaki Miura, Tomoki Ohno, Ryuji Yoshida, Sang Hun Park, Joseph B. Klemp, William C. Skamarock
  • Pennsylvania State University
  • National Center for Atmospheric Research
  • University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
  • University of South Wales
  • Stony Brook University
  • University of California at Davis
  • University of Colorado Boulder
  • NVIDIA
  • Sandia National Laboratories, New Mexico
  • Colorado State University
  • National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
  • Max Planck Institute for Meteorology
  • Deutscher Wetterdienst
  • European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts
  • University of Miami
  • Université Laval and Environment and Climate Change Canada
  • The University of Tokyo
  • Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology
  • Kobe University
  • Yonsei University

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

18 Scopus citations

Abstract

This paper describes the splitting supercell idealized test case used in the 2016 Dynamical Core Model Intercomparison Project (DCMIP2016). These storms are useful test beds for global atmospheric models because the horizontal scale of convective plumes is O(1 km), emphasizing non-hydrostatic dynamics. The test case simulates a supercell on a reduced-radius sphere with nominal resolutions ranging from 4 to 0.5 km and is based on the work of Klemp et al. (2015). Models are initialized with an atmospheric environment conducive to supercell formation and forced with a small thermal perturbation. A simplified Kessler microphysics scheme is coupled to the dynamical core to represent moist processes. Reference solutions for DCMIP2016 models are presented. Storm evolution is broadly similar between models, although differences in the final solution exist. These differences are hypothesized to result from different numerical discretizations, physics-dynamics coupling, and numerical diffusion. Intramodel solutions generally converge as models approach 0.5 km resolution, although exploratory simulations at 0.25 km imply some dynamical cores require more refinement to fully converge. These results can be used as a reference for future dynamical core evaluation, particularly with the development of non-hydrostatic global models intended to be used in convective-permitting regimes.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)879-892
Number of pages14
JournalGeoscientific Model Development
Volume12
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 5 2019

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'DCMIP2016: The splitting supercell test case'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this