Deference and decision-making in science and society: How deference to scientific authority goes beyond confidence in science and scientists to become authoritarianism

Emily L. Howell, Christopher D. Wirz, Dietram A. Scheufele, Dominique Brossard, Michael A. Xenos

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

44 Scopus citations

Abstract

Deference to scientific authority theoretically captures the belief that scientists and not publics should make decisions on science in society. Few studies examine deference, however, and none test this central theoretical claim. The result is deference is often conflated with concepts such as trust in scientists and belief in the authority of science. This study examines two claims key to conceptualizing deference: that deference (1) predicts anti-democratic views of decision-making and (2) relates to but is distinct from beliefs of science as authoritative knowledge. Analyzing US nationally representative data, we find deference to scientific authority does predict anti-democratic views, and this is its distinct conceptual value: trust in scientists and belief in science as authoritative knowledge strongly relate to deference, but both predict pro-democratic views, unlike deference. We discuss how these findings highlight deference as vital for understanding perceptions of science and societal decision-making and how we can better develop the concept.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)800-818
Number of pages19
JournalPublic Understanding of Science
Volume29
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2020

Keywords

  • authoritarianism
  • cultural authority of science
  • deference to scientific authority
  • human gene editing
  • trust in scientists

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Deference and decision-making in science and society: How deference to scientific authority goes beyond confidence in science and scientists to become authoritarianism'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this