TY - JOUR
T1 - Effects of the Alps and Apennines on forecasts for Po Valley convection in two HyMeX cases
AU - Pichelli, Emanuela
AU - Rotunno, Richard
AU - Ferretti, Rossella
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 Royal Meteorological Society
PY - 2017/7
Y1 - 2017/7
N2 - Two Intensive Observation Periods (IOPs) of the Hydrological cycle in the Mediterranean eXperiment (HyMeX) are examined in this study. IOP6 and IOP13 were characterized by troughs with associated cold fronts entering the western Mediterranean and, in both cases, organized frontal convection in the Po Valley was observed. These similarities notwithstanding, predictability of the Po Valley convection was limited for IOP6 for most of the forecast models available during HyMeX, but not for IOP13. Using the Weather Research and Forecast (WRF) model in research mode, the present study confirms the relatively good forecast for frontal convection in IOP13 is not very sensitive to modelling assumptions. In contrast, it is found that only a two-way-nested simulation, initialized close to the event, was able to produce a realistic representation of the squall-line in the Po Valley for IOP6. A comparison between a ‘successful’ and an ‘unsuccessful’ simulation of the Po Valley convection in IOP6 suggests the sensitivity lies with the orographic flow modification which was at the threshold between ‘flow-over’ and ‘flow-around’ responses to the Maritime Alps. In particular, in the ‘flow-over’ regime, downslope winds from the Maritime Alps and Apennines suppress the convergence/uplift where the front encounters the barrier wind in the Po Valley, while in the ‘flow-around’ regime it is unimpeded. A delicate balance between the competing mechanisms of orographically induced subsidence on the lee side of the Apennines and frontal uplift in the Po Valley is found to be crucial for squall-line survival.
AB - Two Intensive Observation Periods (IOPs) of the Hydrological cycle in the Mediterranean eXperiment (HyMeX) are examined in this study. IOP6 and IOP13 were characterized by troughs with associated cold fronts entering the western Mediterranean and, in both cases, organized frontal convection in the Po Valley was observed. These similarities notwithstanding, predictability of the Po Valley convection was limited for IOP6 for most of the forecast models available during HyMeX, but not for IOP13. Using the Weather Research and Forecast (WRF) model in research mode, the present study confirms the relatively good forecast for frontal convection in IOP13 is not very sensitive to modelling assumptions. In contrast, it is found that only a two-way-nested simulation, initialized close to the event, was able to produce a realistic representation of the squall-line in the Po Valley for IOP6. A comparison between a ‘successful’ and an ‘unsuccessful’ simulation of the Po Valley convection in IOP6 suggests the sensitivity lies with the orographic flow modification which was at the threshold between ‘flow-over’ and ‘flow-around’ responses to the Maritime Alps. In particular, in the ‘flow-over’ regime, downslope winds from the Maritime Alps and Apennines suppress the convergence/uplift where the front encounters the barrier wind in the Po Valley, while in the ‘flow-around’ regime it is unimpeded. A delicate balance between the competing mechanisms of orographically induced subsidence on the lee side of the Apennines and frontal uplift in the Po Valley is found to be crucial for squall-line survival.
KW - complex orography meteorology
KW - convection predictability
KW - front blocking
KW - HyMeX
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85029919753
U2 - 10.1002/qj.3096
DO - 10.1002/qj.3096
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85029919753
SN - 0035-9009
VL - 143
SP - 2420
EP - 2435
JO - Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society
JF - Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society
IS - 707
ER -