TY - JOUR
T1 - Emergency Manager Preferences for Rapidly Updating Severe Weather Warnings
AU - Maciag, Taylor A.
AU - Obermeier, Holly
AU - Berry, Kodi
AU - Krocak, Makenzie J.
AU - McClain, Kim Klockow
AU - Hogg, David
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 American Meteorological Society.
PY - 2025/1
Y1 - 2025/1
N2 - Threats-in-motion (TIM) is a technological innovation that would allow NWS forecasters to expand severe thunderstorm and tornado warnings in area and/or time, instead of issuing a series of new warnings. TIM allows warnings to “move” with the storm and provide more equitable lead time for locations downstream of the initial warning. While conceptual research demonstrates this value for example cases, research in NOAA’s Hazardous Weather Testbed revealed that motion instabilities (uncertainties in storm speed or direction, time intervals between forecaster intervention, and combinations of each) could also arise with this system that potentially limit usefulness or effectiveness of the product. To understand the potential trade-offs between the current and future systems, it is important to understand how core partners, such as emergency managers (EMs), would use TIM. In this study, 21 EMs from across the country participated in a simulated severe weather activity where they examined multiple TIM scenarios and provided feedback through surveys and focus groups. The TIM scenarios included visualizations of how TIM might behave under different situations: changes in storm speed, direction, and combinations of each. The simulation revealed that although EMs were optimistic about TIM, they had concerns about warning dissemination and public response. Specifically, the EMs were concerned about how the moving warning polygon could put locations in and out of warnings multiple times over relatively short periods of time, causing confusion from public safety and alerting standpoints.
AB - Threats-in-motion (TIM) is a technological innovation that would allow NWS forecasters to expand severe thunderstorm and tornado warnings in area and/or time, instead of issuing a series of new warnings. TIM allows warnings to “move” with the storm and provide more equitable lead time for locations downstream of the initial warning. While conceptual research demonstrates this value for example cases, research in NOAA’s Hazardous Weather Testbed revealed that motion instabilities (uncertainties in storm speed or direction, time intervals between forecaster intervention, and combinations of each) could also arise with this system that potentially limit usefulness or effectiveness of the product. To understand the potential trade-offs between the current and future systems, it is important to understand how core partners, such as emergency managers (EMs), would use TIM. In this study, 21 EMs from across the country participated in a simulated severe weather activity where they examined multiple TIM scenarios and provided feedback through surveys and focus groups. The TIM scenarios included visualizations of how TIM might behave under different situations: changes in storm speed, direction, and combinations of each. The simulation revealed that although EMs were optimistic about TIM, they had concerns about warning dissemination and public response. Specifically, the EMs were concerned about how the moving warning polygon could put locations in and out of warnings multiple times over relatively short periods of time, causing confusion from public safety and alerting standpoints.
KW - Communications/decision making
KW - Experimental design
KW - Social Science
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85216515867
U2 - 10.1175/WAF-D-24-0029.1
DO - 10.1175/WAF-D-24-0029.1
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85216515867
SN - 0882-8156
VL - 40
SP - 173
EP - 185
JO - Weather and Forecasting
JF - Weather and Forecasting
IS - 1
ER -