TY - JOUR
T1 - Erratum
T2 - Spectral Lines for Polarization Measurements of the Coronal Magnetic Field. II. Consistent Treatment of the Stokes Vector for Magnetic-dipole Transitions (Astrophysical Journal (1999) 522 (524) DOI: 10.1086/307629)
AU - Casini, R.
AU - Judge, P. G.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021. The American Astronomical Society. All rights reserved.
PY - 2021/8/10
Y1 - 2021/8/10
N2 - The expressions 37(b) and 38(b) for the coefficient EJJ0 given in the published article are wrong. The general Equation 36(c), however, is correct. In deriving from it the special cases represented by Equations 37(b) and 38(b), a factor 1/4 was accidentally dropped from the second addendum within the square bracket in both equations. We are grateful to Gabriel Dima and Tom Schad for pointing this out (see also Dima & Schad 2020). Additionally, in Equation 37(b), the (2J + 1) factor in the denominator of that second addendum should have been (2J - 1) instead. Hence, after some straightforward algebraic simplifications, the correct Equations 37(b) and 38(b) become the following, (Eqauation Presented) The authors are grateful to G. Dima for internally reviewing this erratum, and for running various checks on the proposed algebraic formulas. This material is based upon work supported by the National Center for Atmospheric Research, which is a major facility sponsored by the National Science Foundation under Cooperative Agreement No. 1852977.
AB - The expressions 37(b) and 38(b) for the coefficient EJJ0 given in the published article are wrong. The general Equation 36(c), however, is correct. In deriving from it the special cases represented by Equations 37(b) and 38(b), a factor 1/4 was accidentally dropped from the second addendum within the square bracket in both equations. We are grateful to Gabriel Dima and Tom Schad for pointing this out (see also Dima & Schad 2020). Additionally, in Equation 37(b), the (2J + 1) factor in the denominator of that second addendum should have been (2J - 1) instead. Hence, after some straightforward algebraic simplifications, the correct Equations 37(b) and 38(b) become the following, (Eqauation Presented) The authors are grateful to G. Dima for internally reviewing this erratum, and for running various checks on the proposed algebraic formulas. This material is based upon work supported by the National Center for Atmospheric Research, which is a major facility sponsored by the National Science Foundation under Cooperative Agreement No. 1852977.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85113943417
U2 - 10.3847/1538-4357/ac18c8
DO - 10.3847/1538-4357/ac18c8
M3 - Comment/debate
AN - SCOPUS:85113943417
SN - 0004-637X
VL - 917
JO - Astrophysical Journal
JF - Astrophysical Journal
IS - 1
M1 - 50
ER -