Erratum: Spectral Lines for Polarization Measurements of the Coronal Magnetic Field. II. Consistent Treatment of the Stokes Vector for Magnetic-dipole Transitions (Astrophysical Journal (1999) 522 (524) DOI: 10.1086/307629)

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debate

Abstract

The expressions 37(b) and 38(b) for the coefficient EJJ0 given in the published article are wrong. The general Equation 36(c), however, is correct. In deriving from it the special cases represented by Equations 37(b) and 38(b), a factor 1/4 was accidentally dropped from the second addendum within the square bracket in both equations. We are grateful to Gabriel Dima and Tom Schad for pointing this out (see also Dima & Schad 2020). Additionally, in Equation 37(b), the (2J + 1) factor in the denominator of that second addendum should have been (2J - 1) instead. Hence, after some straightforward algebraic simplifications, the correct Equations 37(b) and 38(b) become the following, (Eqauation Presented) The authors are grateful to G. Dima for internally reviewing this erratum, and for running various checks on the proposed algebraic formulas. This material is based upon work supported by the National Center for Atmospheric Research, which is a major facility sponsored by the National Science Foundation under Cooperative Agreement No. 1852977.

Original languageEnglish
Article number50
JournalAstrophysical Journal
Volume917
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 10 2021

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Erratum: Spectral Lines for Polarization Measurements of the Coronal Magnetic Field. II. Consistent Treatment of the Stokes Vector for Magnetic-dipole Transitions (Astrophysical Journal (1999) 522 (524) DOI: 10.1086/307629)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this