Abstract
Tables 1 and 2 of the published material [1] contain a series of typographical errors. In Table 1 the exponent of the B term for N2 was corrected to 1012 and ν for the two N2 cases should be ν2 for the King correction factor. In Table 2 the units are (cm2×1027), the N2 calculation at 660.0 nm is 2.21×10–27 cm2 and the O2 calculation at 532.2 nm is 4.66×10–27 cm2. These errors have been corrected in Tables 1 and 2 below. Eq. (1) (calculation of Rayleigh cross-section from the refractive index) and 2 (calculation of refractive index from empirical data) of Ref. [1] are also reproduced here for calculation of the Rayleigh Scattering cross-sections using the values given in Table 1. For air, the calculations account for 360 ppm of atmospheric CO2 following Bodhaine [7]. These errors were in the final typeset manuscript only, and did not affect the findings or analysis of the paper.(formula
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 281-282 |
| Number of pages | 2 |
| Journal | Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy and Radiative Transfer |
| Volume | 189 |
| DOIs |
|
| State | Published - Mar 1 2017 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Erratum to “Rayleigh scattering cross-section measurements of nitrogen, argon, oxygen and air” (Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy and Radiative Transfer (2014) 147 (171–177) (S0022407314002453) (10.1016/j.jqsrt.2014.05.030))'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver