TY - JOUR
T1 - Estimating the uncertainty of using GPS radio occultation data for climate monitoring
T2 - Intercomparison of CHAMP refractivity climate records from 2002 to 2006 from different data centers
AU - Ho, Shu Peng
AU - Kirchengast, Gottfried
AU - Leroy, Stephen
AU - Wickert, Jens
AU - Mannucci, Anthony J.
AU - Steiner, Andrea
AU - Hunt, Doug
AU - Schreiner, William
AU - Sokolovskiy, Sergey
AU - Ao, Chi
AU - Borsche, Michael
AU - Von Engeln, Axel
AU - Foelsche, Ulrich
AU - Heise, Stefan
AU - Iijima, Byron
AU - Kuo, Ying Hwa
AU - Kursinski, Rob
AU - Pirscher, Barbara
AU - Ringer, Mark
AU - Rocken, Chris
AU - Schmidt, Torsten
PY - 2009/12
Y1 - 2009/12
N2 - To examine the suitability of GPS radio occultation (RO) observations as a climate benchmark data set, this study aims at quantifying the structural uncertainty in GPS RO-derived vertical profiles of refractivity and measured refractivity trends obtained from atmospheric excess phase processing and inversion procedures. Five years (2002-2006) of monthly mean climatologies (MMC) of retrieved refractivity from the experiment aboard the German satellite CHAMP generated by four RO operational centers were compared. Results show that the absolute values of fractional refractivity anomalies among the centers are, in general, ≤0.2% from 8 to 25 km altitude. The median absolute deviations among the centers are less than 0.2% globally. Because the differences in fractional refractivity produced by the four centers are, in general, unchanging with time, the uncertainty of the trend for fractional refractivity anomalies among centers is ±0.04% per 5 years globally. The primary cause of the trend uncertainty is due to different quality control methods used by the four centers, which yield different sampling errors for different centers. We used the National Centers for Environmental Prediction reanalysis in the same period to estimate sampling errors. After removing the sampling errors, the uncertainty of the trend for fractional refractivity anomalies among centers is between -0.03 and 0.01% per 5 years. Thus 0.03% per 5 years can be considered an upper bound in the processing scheme-induced uncertainly for global refractivity trend monitoring. Systematic errors common to all centers are not discussed in this article but are generally believed to be small.
AB - To examine the suitability of GPS radio occultation (RO) observations as a climate benchmark data set, this study aims at quantifying the structural uncertainty in GPS RO-derived vertical profiles of refractivity and measured refractivity trends obtained from atmospheric excess phase processing and inversion procedures. Five years (2002-2006) of monthly mean climatologies (MMC) of retrieved refractivity from the experiment aboard the German satellite CHAMP generated by four RO operational centers were compared. Results show that the absolute values of fractional refractivity anomalies among the centers are, in general, ≤0.2% from 8 to 25 km altitude. The median absolute deviations among the centers are less than 0.2% globally. Because the differences in fractional refractivity produced by the four centers are, in general, unchanging with time, the uncertainty of the trend for fractional refractivity anomalies among centers is ±0.04% per 5 years globally. The primary cause of the trend uncertainty is due to different quality control methods used by the four centers, which yield different sampling errors for different centers. We used the National Centers for Environmental Prediction reanalysis in the same period to estimate sampling errors. After removing the sampling errors, the uncertainty of the trend for fractional refractivity anomalies among centers is between -0.03 and 0.01% per 5 years. Thus 0.03% per 5 years can be considered an upper bound in the processing scheme-induced uncertainly for global refractivity trend monitoring. Systematic errors common to all centers are not discussed in this article but are generally believed to be small.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/72049099049
U2 - 10.1029/2009JD011969
DO - 10.1029/2009JD011969
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:72049099049
SN - 0148-0227
VL - 114
JO - Journal of Geophysical Research
JF - Journal of Geophysical Research
IS - 23
M1 - D23107
ER -