TY - JOUR
T1 - Evaluating Uncertainty and Modes of Variability for Antarctic Atmospheric Rivers
AU - Shields, Christine A.
AU - Wille, Jonathan D.
AU - Marquardt Collow, Allison B.
AU - Maclennan, Michelle
AU - Gorodetskaya, Irina V.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022. The Authors.
PY - 2022/8/28
Y1 - 2022/8/28
N2 - Antarctic atmospheric rivers (ARs) are driven by their synoptic environments and lead to profound and varying impacts along the coastlines and over the continent. The definition and detection of ARs over Antarctica accounts for large uncertainty in AR metrics, and consequently, impacts quantification. We find that Antarctic-specific detection tools consistently capture the AR footprint inland over ice sheets, whereas most global detection tools do not. Large-scale synoptic environments and associated ARs, however, are broadly consistent across detection tools. Using data from the Atmospheric River Tracking Method Intercomparison Project and global reanalyses, we quantify the uncertainty in Antarctic AR metrics and evaluate large-scale environments in the context of decadal and interannual modes of variability. The Antarctic western hemisphere has stronger connections to both decadal and interannual modes of variability compared to East Antarctica, and the Indian Ocean Dipole’s influence on Antarctic ARs is stronger while in phase with El Nino Southern Oscillation.
AB - Antarctic atmospheric rivers (ARs) are driven by their synoptic environments and lead to profound and varying impacts along the coastlines and over the continent. The definition and detection of ARs over Antarctica accounts for large uncertainty in AR metrics, and consequently, impacts quantification. We find that Antarctic-specific detection tools consistently capture the AR footprint inland over ice sheets, whereas most global detection tools do not. Large-scale synoptic environments and associated ARs, however, are broadly consistent across detection tools. Using data from the Atmospheric River Tracking Method Intercomparison Project and global reanalyses, we quantify the uncertainty in Antarctic AR metrics and evaluate large-scale environments in the context of decadal and interannual modes of variability. The Antarctic western hemisphere has stronger connections to both decadal and interannual modes of variability compared to East Antarctica, and the Indian Ocean Dipole’s influence on Antarctic ARs is stronger while in phase with El Nino Southern Oscillation.
KW - AR detection tools
KW - Antarctica
KW - atmospheric river
KW - climate dynamics
KW - modes of variability
KW - uncertainty
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85137731454
U2 - 10.1029/2022GL099577
DO - 10.1029/2022GL099577
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85137731454
SN - 0094-8276
VL - 49
JO - Geophysical Research Letters
JF - Geophysical Research Letters
IS - 16
M1 - e2022GL099577
ER -