Evaluating Uncertainty and Modes of Variability for Antarctic Atmospheric Rivers

Christine A. Shields, Jonathan D. Wille, Allison B. Marquardt Collow, Michelle Maclennan, Irina V. Gorodetskaya

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

32 Scopus citations

Abstract

Antarctic atmospheric rivers (ARs) are driven by their synoptic environments and lead to profound and varying impacts along the coastlines and over the continent. The definition and detection of ARs over Antarctica accounts for large uncertainty in AR metrics, and consequently, impacts quantification. We find that Antarctic-specific detection tools consistently capture the AR footprint inland over ice sheets, whereas most global detection tools do not. Large-scale synoptic environments and associated ARs, however, are broadly consistent across detection tools. Using data from the Atmospheric River Tracking Method Intercomparison Project and global reanalyses, we quantify the uncertainty in Antarctic AR metrics and evaluate large-scale environments in the context of decadal and interannual modes of variability. The Antarctic western hemisphere has stronger connections to both decadal and interannual modes of variability compared to East Antarctica, and the Indian Ocean Dipole’s influence on Antarctic ARs is stronger while in phase with El Nino Southern Oscillation.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere2022GL099577
JournalGeophysical Research Letters
Volume49
Issue number16
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 28 2022

Keywords

  • AR detection tools
  • Antarctica
  • atmospheric river
  • climate dynamics
  • modes of variability
  • uncertainty

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Evaluating Uncertainty and Modes of Variability for Antarctic Atmospheric Rivers'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this