Geotail and LFM comparisons of plasma sheet climatology: 2. Flow variability

Timothy B. Guild, Harlan E. Spence, E. Larry Kepko, Viacheslav Merkin, John G. Lyon, Michael Wiltberger, Charles C. Goodrich

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

13 Scopus citations

Abstract

We characterize the variability of central plasma sheet bulk flows with a 6-year Geotail data set and a 2-month Lyon-Fedder-Mobarry (LFM) global MHD simulation at two spatial resolutions. Comparing long databases of observed and simulated parameters enable rigorous statistical tests of the model's ability to predict plasma sheet properties during routine driving conditions and represent a new method of global MHD validation. In this study, we use probability density functions (PDFs) to compare the statistics of plasma sheet velocities in the Geotail observations with those in the LFM simulations. We find that the low-resolution model grossly underestimates the occurrence of fast earthward and tailward flows. Increasing the simulation resolution inherently changes plasma sheet mass transport in the model, allowing the development of fast, bursty flows. These flows fill out the wings of the velocity distribution and bring the PDF into closer agreement with observations.

Original languageEnglish
Article numberA04217
JournalJournal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics
Volume113
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2008

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Geotail and LFM comparisons of plasma sheet climatology: 2. Flow variability'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this