Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Global Carbon Budget 2025

  • Pierre Friedlingstein
  • , Michael O'sullivan
  • , Matthew W. Jones
  • , Robbie M. Andrew
  • , Dorothee C.E. Bakker
  • , Judith Hauck
  • , Peter Landschützer
  • , Corinne Le Quéré
  • , Hongmei Li
  • , Ingrid T. Luijkx
  • , Glen P. Peters
  • , Wouter Peters
  • , Julia Pongratz
  • , Clemens Schwingshackl
  • , Stephen Sitch
  • , Josep G. Canadell
  • , Philippe Ciais
  • , Kjetil Aas
  • , Simone R. Alin
  • , Peter Anthoni
  • Leticia Barbero, Nicholas R. Bates, Nicolas Bellouin, Alice Benoit-Cattin, Carla F. Berghoff, Raffaele Bernardello, Laurent Bopp, Ida Bagus Mandhara Brasika, Matthew A. Chamberlain, Naveen Chandra, Frédéric Chevallier, Louise P. Chini, Nathan O. Collier, Thomas H. Colligan, Margot Cronin, Laique M. Djeutchouang, Xinyu Dou, Matt P. Enright, Kazutaka Enyo, Michael Erb, Wiley Evans, Richard A. Feely, Liang Feng, Daniel J. Ford, Adrianna Foster, Filippa Fransner, Thomas Gasser, Marion Gehlen, Thanos Gkritzalis, Jefferson Goncalves De Souza, Giacomo Grassi, Luke Gregor, Nicolas Gruber, Bertrand Guenet, Özgür Gürses, Kirsty Harrington, Ian Harris, Jens Heinke, George C. Hurtt, Yosuke Iida, Tatiana Ilyina, Akihiko Ito, Andrew R. Jacobson, Atul K. Jain, Tereza Jarníková, Annika Jersild, Fei Jiang, Steve D. Jones, Etsushi Kato, Ralph F. Keeling, Kees Klein Goldewijk, Jürgen Knauer, Yawen Kong, Jan Ivar Korsbakken, Charles Koven, Taro Kunimitsu, Xin Lan, Junjie Liu, Zhiqiang Liu, Zhu Liu, Claire Lo Monaco, Lei Ma, Gregg Marland, Patrick C. Mcguire, Galen A. Mckinley, Joe R. Melton, Natalie Monacci, Erwan Monier, Eric J. Morgan, David R. Munro, Jens D. Müller, Shin Ichiro Nakaoka, Lorna R. Nayagam, Yosuke Niwa, Tobias Nutzel, Are Olsen, Abdirahman M. Omar, Naiqing Pan, Sudhanshu Pandey, Denis Pierrot, Zhangcai Qin, Pierre Regnier, Gregor Rehder, Laure Resplandy, Alizée Roobaert, Thais M. Rosan, Christian Rödenbeck, Jörg Schwinger, Ingunn Skjelvan, T. Luke Smallman, Victoria Spada, Mohanan G. Sreeush, Qing Sun, Adrienne J. Sutton, Colm Sweeney, Didier Swingedouw, Roland Séférian, Shintaro Takao, Hiroaki Tatebe, Hanqin Tian, Xiangjun Tian, Bronte Tilbrook, Hiroyuki Tsujino, Francesco Tubiello, Erik Van Ooijen, Guido R. Van Der Werf, Sebastiaan J. Van De Velde, Anthony P. Walker, Rik Wanninkhof, Xiaojuan Yang, Wenping Yuan, Xu Yue, Jiye Zeng
  • University of Exeter
  • École normale supérieure
  • University of East Anglia
  • CICERO Center for International Climate Research
  • Alfred Wegener Institute - Helmholtz Centre for Polar and Marine Research
  • University of Bremen
  • InnovOceanSite
  • Helmholtz-Zentrum Hereon
  • Max Planck Institute for Meteorology
  • Wageningen University & Research
  • University of Groningen
  • Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich
  • CSIRO
  • Université Versailles St-Quentin
  • National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
  • Karlsruhe Institute of Technology
  • University of Miami
  • Arizona State University
  • Bermuda Institute of Ocean Sciences
  • University of Reading
  • Marine and Freshwater Research Institute
  • Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Desarrollo Pesquero (INIDEP)
  • Barcelona Supercomputing Centre
  • Universitas Udayana
  • Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology
  • University of Maryland, College Park
  • Oak Ridge National Laboratory
  • Marine Institute
  • Stellenbosch University
  • Council for Scientific and Industrial Research
  • University of California at Davis
  • Stanford University
  • Japan Meteorological Agency
  • Appalachian State University
  • Tula Foundation
  • University of Edinburgh
  • National Center for Atmospheric Research
  • University of Bergen
  • Bjerknes Centre for Climate Research
  • International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Laxenburg
  • European Commission Joint Research Centre Institute
  • Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich
  • Swiss Data Science Center
  • PSL Research University
  • University of Oxford
  • Leibniz Association
  • University of Hamburg
  • The University of Tokyo
  • University of Colorado Boulder
  • University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
  • Nanjing University
  • The Institute of Applied Energy
  • University of California at San Diego
  • Utrecht University
  • University of Technology Sydney
  • CAS - Aerospace Information Research Institute
  • Tsinghua University
  • Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
  • California Institute of Technology
  • CMA Key Open Laboratory of Transforming Climate Resources to Economy
  • Sorbonne Université
  • Columbia University
  • Université Laval and Environment and Climate Change Canada
  • University of Alaska Fairbanks
  • Carbon to Sea Initiative
  • National Institute for Environmental Studies of Japan
  • Norwegian Research Centre
  • Boston College
  • Sun Yat-Sen University
  • Université libre de Bruxelles
  • Leibniz Institute for Baltic Sea Research
  • Princeton University
  • Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry
  • University of Bern
  • Université de Bordeaux
  • Paul Sabatier University
  • Chinese Academy of Sciences
  • University of Tasmania
  • Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
  • National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research
  • University of Otago
  • Peking University
  • Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Accurate assessment of anthropogenic carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions and their redistribution among the atmosphere, ocean, and terrestrial biosphere in a changing climate is critical to better understand the global carbon cycle, support the development of climate policies, and project future climate change. Here we describe and synthesise datasets and methodologies to quantify the five major components of the global carbon budget and their uncertainties. Fossil CO2 emissions (EFOS) are based on energy and cement production data. Emissions from land-use change (ELUC) are estimated by bookkeeping models based on land-use data. The global atmospheric CO2 growth rate (GATM) is computed from changes in concentration measured at surface stations. The global net uptake of CO2 by the ocean (SOCEAN) is estimated with global ocean biogeochemistry models and observation-based fCO2-products. The global net uptake of CO2 by the land (SLAND) is estimated with dynamic global vegetation models. Additional lines of evidence are provided by atmospheric inversions, atmospheric oxygen measurements, ocean interior observation-based estimates, and Earth System Models. This year, we introduced corrections on the ELUC, SOCEAN and SLAND estimates. The sum of all sources and sinks results in the carbon budget imbalance (BIM), a measure of imperfect data and incomplete understanding of the contemporary carbon cycle. All uncertainties are reported as ± 1σ. For the year 2024, EFOS increased by 1.1 % relative to 2023, with fossil emissions at 10.3 ± 0.5 GtC yr-1 (including the cement carbonation sink, 0.2 GtC yr-1), ELUC was 1.3 ± 0.7 GtC yr-1, for total anthropogenic CO2 emissions of 11.6 ± 0.9 GtC yr-1 (42.4 ± 3.2 GtCO2 yr-1). Also, for 2024, GATM was 7.9 ± 0.2 GtC yr-1 (3.73 ± 0.1 ppm yr-1), 2.2 GtC above the 2023 growth rate. SOCEAN was 3.4 ± 0.4 GtC yr-1 and SLAND was 1.9 ± 1.1 GtC yr-1, leaving a large negative BIM (-1.7 GtC yr-1), suggesting that the total sink or GATM is strongly overestimated in 2024. The global atmospheric CO2 concentration averaged over 2024 reached 422.8 ± 0.1 ppm. Preliminary data for 2025 suggest an increase in EFOS relative to 2024 of +1.0 % (0.2 % to 1.7 %) globally, and atmospheric CO2 concentration increasing by 2.1 ppm reaching 425.6 ppm, 53 % above the pre-industrial level (around 278 ppm in 1750). Overall, the mean and trend in the components of the global carbon budget are consistently estimated over the period 1959-2024, with a near-zero overall budget imbalance, although discrepancies of up to around 1 GtC yr-1 persist for the representation of annual to decadal variability in CO2 fluxes. Comparison of estimates from multiple approaches and observations shows: (1) a persistent large uncertainty in the estimate of land-use change emissions, (2) a low agreement between the different methods on the magnitude of the land CO2 flux in the northern extra-tropics, and (3) a discrepancy between the different methods on the mean ocean sink. This living data update documents changes in methods and datasets applied to this most-recent global carbon budget as well as evolving community understanding of the global carbon cycle. The data presented in this work are available at 10.18160/GCP-2025 (Friedlingstein et al., 2025c).

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)3211-3288
Number of pages78
JournalEarth System Science Data
Volume18
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 13 2026
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Global Carbon Budget 2025'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this