TY - GEN
T1 - GPS carrier-phase time transfer boundary discontinuity investigation
AU - Yao, Jian
AU - Levine, Judah
PY - 2012
Y1 - 2012
N2 - We report on a study of the carrier-phase time transfer boundary discontinuity by the use of the precise point positioning (PPP) technique. Carrier-phase time transfer is first compared with two-way satellite time and frequency transfer (TWSTFT) between the same stations. It matches TWSTFT quite well and provides better short-term stability. Later, we extract 1-day data-arc boundary discontinuity jump values for 151 days. The distribution of jump values is almost Gaussian. Different GPS receivers have different mean jump values (-200 ps to +200 ps) and different standard deviations (100 ps to 300 ps). Among the receivers at NIST (USA), USNO (USA), and PTB (Germany), USNO has the smallest absolute mean jump value (14.2 ps) and the smallest deviation (105.1 ps). In addition, with the increase of data-arc from 1-day to 4-days, both mean value and deviation increase. For receivers at the same station, the correlation varies. At PTB, the correlation between the jumps for receivers PTBB and PTBG is only -0.064. At NICT (Japan), the correlation between receivers SEPA and SEPB is 0.47, while that between receivers SEPB and SEPT is 0.10. The above variation in the correlation between receivers at the same location suggests that the boundary discontinuity does not mainly come from satellite-path-related noise. Further investigation reveals that multipath also contributes little to boundary discontinuity. Comparison between PPP and network method shows that the algorithm of fixing phase ambiguity plays an important role in boundary discontinuity.
AB - We report on a study of the carrier-phase time transfer boundary discontinuity by the use of the precise point positioning (PPP) technique. Carrier-phase time transfer is first compared with two-way satellite time and frequency transfer (TWSTFT) between the same stations. It matches TWSTFT quite well and provides better short-term stability. Later, we extract 1-day data-arc boundary discontinuity jump values for 151 days. The distribution of jump values is almost Gaussian. Different GPS receivers have different mean jump values (-200 ps to +200 ps) and different standard deviations (100 ps to 300 ps). Among the receivers at NIST (USA), USNO (USA), and PTB (Germany), USNO has the smallest absolute mean jump value (14.2 ps) and the smallest deviation (105.1 ps). In addition, with the increase of data-arc from 1-day to 4-days, both mean value and deviation increase. For receivers at the same station, the correlation varies. At PTB, the correlation between the jumps for receivers PTBB and PTBG is only -0.064. At NICT (Japan), the correlation between receivers SEPA and SEPB is 0.47, while that between receivers SEPB and SEPT is 0.10. The above variation in the correlation between receivers at the same location suggests that the boundary discontinuity does not mainly come from satellite-path-related noise. Further investigation reveals that multipath also contributes little to boundary discontinuity. Comparison between PPP and network method shows that the algorithm of fixing phase ambiguity plays an important role in boundary discontinuity.
KW - Boundary discontinuity
KW - Carrier-phase
KW - GPS
KW - Precise point positioning
KW - Time transfer
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/84890256735
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:84890256735
SN - 9781627488716
T3 - 44th Annual Precise Time and Time Interval (PTTI) Systems and Applications Meeting 2012
SP - 317
EP - 325
BT - 44th Annual Precise Time and Time Interval (PTTI) Systems and Applications Meeting 2012
T2 - 44th Annual Precise Time and Time Interval (PTTI) Systems and Applications Meeting 2012
Y2 - 26 November 2012 through 29 November 2012
ER -