High-Latitude Joule Heating in TIE-GCM 3.0: Evaluation of Different Plasma Convection Forcing Models

Florian Günzkofer, Hanli Liu, Huixin Liu, Gunter Stober, Gang Lu, Haonan Wu, Nicholas Bartel, Frank Heymann, Claudia Borries

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

We systematically evaluate the high-latitude Joule heating of the recently released version 3.0 Thermosphere Ionosphere Electrodynamics General Circulation Model (TIE-GCM) by comparison to EISCAT incoherent scatter radar measurements. The model performance is examined using normalized root mean square deviations derived from test runs driven by different convection patterns from empirical and data-assimilated models. The following features are revealed: (a) Data-assimilated geomagnetic forcing improves the agreement between modeled and EISCAT-derived Joule heating rates by 8%, 28%, and 54% for low, moderate, and high geomagnetic activity. (b) Increasing model grid resolution from 2.5° to 1.25° leads to (Formula presented.) 20% higher Joule heating rates. (c) AMIE-driven runs better reproduce the magnitude of the Joule heating rates, AMGeO-driven runs the vertical profile. (d) Internal model time step resolution has no effect on the Joule heating rates.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere2025GL117647
JournalGeophysical Research Letters
Volume52
Issue number17
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 16 2025
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • EISCAT
  • Joule heating
  • TIE-GCM
  • high-latitude ionosphere

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'High-Latitude Joule Heating in TIE-GCM 3.0: Evaluation of Different Plasma Convection Forcing Models'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this