High-Latitude Stratospheric Aerosol Geoengineering Can Be More Effective if Injection Is Limited to Spring

Walker Raymond Lee, Douglas G. MacMartin, Daniele Visioni, Ben Kravitz

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

48 Scopus citations

Abstract

Stratospheric aerosol geoengineering focused on the Arctic could substantially reduce local and worldwide impacts of anthropogenic global warming. Because the Arctic receives little sunlight during the winter, stratospheric aerosols present in the winter at high latitudes have little impact on the climate, whereas stratospheric aerosols present during the summer achieve larger changes in radiative forcing. Injecting SO2 in the spring leads to peak aerosol optical depth (AOD) in the summer. We demonstrate that spring injection produces approximately twice as much summer AOD as year-round injection and restores approximately twice as much September sea ice, resulting in less increase in stratospheric sulfur burden, stratospheric heating, and stratospheric ozone depletion per unit of sea ice restored. We also find that differences in AOD between different seasonal injection strategies are small compared to the difference between annual and spring injection.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere2021GL092696
JournalGeophysical Research Letters
Volume48
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - May 16 2021

Keywords

  • Arctic sea ice
  • geoengineering
  • stratospheric aerosol injection

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'High-Latitude Stratospheric Aerosol Geoengineering Can Be More Effective if Injection Is Limited to Spring'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this