TY - JOUR
T1 - Impact of Cloud-Base Turbulence on CCN Activation
T2 - CCN Distribution
AU - GRABOWSKI, WOJCIECH W.
AU - Thomas, Lois
AU - Kumar, Bipin
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 American Meteorological Society. All rights reserved.
PY - 2022/11
Y1 - 2022/11
N2 - Following our previous investigation of the turbulence impact on cloud-base single-size CCN activation, this study considers a similar problem assuming CCN size distribution obtained from field measurements. The total CNN concentration is taken as either 200 cm23 to represent clean conditions, or as 2000 cm23 to represent polluted conditions. CCN is assumed to be sodium chloride. The CCN activation in the rising nonturbulent adiabatic parcel is contrasted with the activation within a rising adiabatic parcel filled with inertial-range homogeneous isotropic turbulence. The turbulent parcel of 643 m3 and the turbulent kinetic energy dissipation rate of 1023 m22 s23 are used in most of the simulations. Results for a range of mean parcel ascent rates, between 0.125 and 8 m s21, are discussed. Overall, the adiabatic turbulent parcel simulations show results consistent with the adiabatic nonturbulent parcel, with higher activated CCN concentrations for stronger parcel ascent rates. The key difference is a blurriness of the separation between dry CCN size bins featuring activated and nonactivated (haze) CCN, especially for weak mean ascent rates. The blurriness comes from CCN getting activated and subsequently deactivated in the fluctuating supersaturation field, instead of all becoming cloud droplets above the cloud base. This leads to significantly larger spectral widths in turbulent parcel simulations compared to the nonturbulent parcel when activation is completed. Modeling results are discussed in the context of the impact of turbulent fluctuations on CCN activation documented in laboratory experiments using the Pi chamber.
AB - Following our previous investigation of the turbulence impact on cloud-base single-size CCN activation, this study considers a similar problem assuming CCN size distribution obtained from field measurements. The total CNN concentration is taken as either 200 cm23 to represent clean conditions, or as 2000 cm23 to represent polluted conditions. CCN is assumed to be sodium chloride. The CCN activation in the rising nonturbulent adiabatic parcel is contrasted with the activation within a rising adiabatic parcel filled with inertial-range homogeneous isotropic turbulence. The turbulent parcel of 643 m3 and the turbulent kinetic energy dissipation rate of 1023 m22 s23 are used in most of the simulations. Results for a range of mean parcel ascent rates, between 0.125 and 8 m s21, are discussed. Overall, the adiabatic turbulent parcel simulations show results consistent with the adiabatic nonturbulent parcel, with higher activated CCN concentrations for stronger parcel ascent rates. The key difference is a blurriness of the separation between dry CCN size bins featuring activated and nonactivated (haze) CCN, especially for weak mean ascent rates. The blurriness comes from CCN getting activated and subsequently deactivated in the fluctuating supersaturation field, instead of all becoming cloud droplets above the cloud base. This leads to significantly larger spectral widths in turbulent parcel simulations compared to the nonturbulent parcel when activation is completed. Modeling results are discussed in the context of the impact of turbulent fluctuations on CCN activation documented in laboratory experiments using the Pi chamber.
KW - Aerosols
KW - Cloud microphysics
KW - Cumulus clouds
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85141481216
U2 - 10.1175/JAS-D-22-0075.1
DO - 10.1175/JAS-D-22-0075.1
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85141481216
SN - 0022-4928
VL - 79
SP - 2965
EP - 2981
JO - Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences
JF - Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences
IS - 11
ER -