TY - JOUR
T1 - Impact of Cloud-Base Turbulence on CCN Activation
T2 - Single-Size CCN
AU - GRABOWSKI, WOJCIECH W.
AU - THOMAS, LOIS
AU - KUMAR, BIPIN
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 American Meteorological Society.
PY - 2022/2
Y1 - 2022/2
N2 - This paper examines the impact of cloud-base turbulence on activation of cloud condensation nuclei (CCN). Following our previous studies, we contrast activation within a nonturbulent adiabatic parcel and an adiabatic parcel filled with turbulence. The latter is simulated by applying a forced implicit large-eddy simulation within a triply periodic computational domain of 643 m3.We consider two monodisperse CCN. Small CCN have a dry radius of 0.01 mm and a corresponding activation (critical) radius and critical supersaturation of 0.6 mm and 1.3%, respectively. Large CCN have a dry radius of 0.2 mm and feature activation radius of 5.4 mm and critical supersaturation 0.15%. CCN are assumed in 200-cm23 concentration in all cases. Mean cloud-base updraft velocities of 0.33, 1, and 3 m s21 are considered. In the nonturbulent parcel, all CCN are activated and lead to a monodisperse droplet size distribution above the cloud base, with practically the same droplet size in all simulations. In contrast, turbulence can lead to activation of only a fraction of all CCN with a nonzero spectral width above the cloud base, of the order of 1 mm, especially in the case of small CCN and weak mean cloud-base ascent. We compare our results to studies of the turbulent single-size CCN activation in the Pi chamber. Sensitivity simulations that apply a smaller turbulence intensity, smaller computational domain, and modified initial conditions document the impact of specific modeling assumptions. The simulations call for a more realistic high-resolution modeling of turbulent cloud-base activation.
AB - This paper examines the impact of cloud-base turbulence on activation of cloud condensation nuclei (CCN). Following our previous studies, we contrast activation within a nonturbulent adiabatic parcel and an adiabatic parcel filled with turbulence. The latter is simulated by applying a forced implicit large-eddy simulation within a triply periodic computational domain of 643 m3.We consider two monodisperse CCN. Small CCN have a dry radius of 0.01 mm and a corresponding activation (critical) radius and critical supersaturation of 0.6 mm and 1.3%, respectively. Large CCN have a dry radius of 0.2 mm and feature activation radius of 5.4 mm and critical supersaturation 0.15%. CCN are assumed in 200-cm23 concentration in all cases. Mean cloud-base updraft velocities of 0.33, 1, and 3 m s21 are considered. In the nonturbulent parcel, all CCN are activated and lead to a monodisperse droplet size distribution above the cloud base, with practically the same droplet size in all simulations. In contrast, turbulence can lead to activation of only a fraction of all CCN with a nonzero spectral width above the cloud base, of the order of 1 mm, especially in the case of small CCN and weak mean cloud-base ascent. We compare our results to studies of the turbulent single-size CCN activation in the Pi chamber. Sensitivity simulations that apply a smaller turbulence intensity, smaller computational domain, and modified initial conditions document the impact of specific modeling assumptions. The simulations call for a more realistic high-resolution modeling of turbulent cloud-base activation.
KW - Aerosol-cloud interaction
KW - Aerosols
KW - Cloud droplets
KW - Condensation
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85126103763
U2 - 10.1175/JAS-D-21-0184.1
DO - 10.1175/JAS-D-21-0184.1
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85126103763
SN - 0022-4928
VL - 79
SP - 551
EP - 566
JO - Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences
JF - Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences
IS - 2
ER -