Impact of consistent boundary layer mixing approaches between NAM and CMAQ

  • Pius Lee
  • , Youhua Tang
  • , Daiwen Kang
  • , Jeff McQueen
  • , Marina Tsidulko
  • , Ho Chun Huang
  • , Sarah Lu
  • , Mary Hart
  • , Hsin Mu Lin
  • , Shaocai Yu
  • , Geoff DiMego
  • , Ivanka Stajner
  • , Paula Davidson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

8 Scopus citations

Abstract

Discrepancies in grid structure, dynamics and physics packages in the offline coupled NWS/NCEP NAM meteorological model with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) model can give rise to inconsistencies. This study investigates the use of three vertical mixing schemes to drive chemistry tracers in the National Air Quality Forecast Capability (NAQFC). The three schemes evaluated in this study represent various degrees of coupling to improve the commonality in turbulence parameterization between the meteorological and chemistry models. The methods tested include: (1) using NAM predicted TKE-based planetary boundary height, h, as the prime parameter to derive CMAQ vertical diffusivity; (2) using the NAM mixed layer depth to determine h and then proceeding as in (1); and (3) using NAM predicted vertical diffusivity directly to parameterize turbulence mixing within CMAQ. A two week period with elevated surface O3 concentrations during the summer 2006 has been selected to test these schemes in a sensitivity study. The study results are verified and evaluated using the EPA AIRNow monitoring network and other ozonesonde data. The third method is preferred a priori as it represents the tightest coupling option studied in this work for turbulent mixing processes between the meteorological and air quality models. It was found to accurately reproduce the upper bounds of turbulent mixing and provide the best agreement between predicted h and ozonesonde observed relative humidity profile inferred h for sites investigated in this study. However, this did not translate into the best agreement in surface O3 concentrations. Overall verification results during the test period of two weeks in August 2006, did not show superiority of this method over the other 2 methods in all regions of the continental U.S. Further efforts in model improvement for the parameterizations of turbulent mixing and other surface O3 forecast related processes are warranted.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)23-42
Number of pages20
JournalEnvironmental Fluid Mechanics
Volume9
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 2009

Keywords

  • Air quality forecast
  • Boundary layer
  • Ozonesondes and AIRNOW
  • Surface ozone
  • Turbulent mixing

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Impact of consistent boundary layer mixing approaches between NAM and CMAQ'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this