TY - JOUR
T1 - Intercalibration of the Plasma Density Measurements in Earth's Topside Ionosphere
AU - Smirnov, Artem
AU - Shprits, Yuri
AU - Zhelavskaya, Irina
AU - Lühr, Hermann
AU - Xiong, Chao
AU - Goss, Andreas
AU - Prol, Fabricio S.
AU - Schmidt, Michael
AU - Hoque, Mainul
AU - Pedatella, Nicholas
AU - Szabó-Roberts, Mátyás
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
©2021. The Authors.
PY - 2021/10
Y1 - 2021/10
N2 - Over the last 20 years, a large number of instruments have provided plasma density measurements in Earth's topside ionosphere. To utilize all of the collected observations for empirical modeling, it is necessary to ensure that they do not exhibit systematic differences and are adjusted to the same reference frame. In this study, we compare satellite plasma density observations from Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE), Constellation Observing System for Meteorology, Ionosphere, and Climate (COSMIC), CHAllenging Minisatellite Payload (CHAMP), Swarm, and Communications/Navigation Outage Forecasting System (C/NOFS) missions. Electron densities retrieved from GRACE K-Band Ranging (KBR) system, previously shown to be in excellent agreement with incoherent scatter radar (ISR) measurements, are used as a reference. We find that COSMIC radio occultation (RO) densities are highly consistent with GRACE-KBR observations showing a mean relative difference of < (Formula presented.), and therefore no calibration factors between them are necessary. We utilize the outstanding three-dimensional coverage of the topside ionosphere by the COSMIC mission to perform conjunction analysis with in situ density observations from CHAMP, C/NOFS, and Swarm missions. CHAMP measurements are lower than COSMIC by ∼ (Formula presented.). Swarm densities are generally lower at daytime and higher at nighttime compared to COSMIC. C/NOFS ion densities agree well with COSMIC, with a relative bias of ∼ (Formula presented.). The resulting cross-calibration factors, derived from the probability distribution functions, help to eliminate the systematic leveling differences between the data sets, and allow using these data jointly in a large number of ionospheric applications.
AB - Over the last 20 years, a large number of instruments have provided plasma density measurements in Earth's topside ionosphere. To utilize all of the collected observations for empirical modeling, it is necessary to ensure that they do not exhibit systematic differences and are adjusted to the same reference frame. In this study, we compare satellite plasma density observations from Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE), Constellation Observing System for Meteorology, Ionosphere, and Climate (COSMIC), CHAllenging Minisatellite Payload (CHAMP), Swarm, and Communications/Navigation Outage Forecasting System (C/NOFS) missions. Electron densities retrieved from GRACE K-Band Ranging (KBR) system, previously shown to be in excellent agreement with incoherent scatter radar (ISR) measurements, are used as a reference. We find that COSMIC radio occultation (RO) densities are highly consistent with GRACE-KBR observations showing a mean relative difference of < (Formula presented.), and therefore no calibration factors between them are necessary. We utilize the outstanding three-dimensional coverage of the topside ionosphere by the COSMIC mission to perform conjunction analysis with in situ density observations from CHAMP, C/NOFS, and Swarm missions. CHAMP measurements are lower than COSMIC by ∼ (Formula presented.). Swarm densities are generally lower at daytime and higher at nighttime compared to COSMIC. C/NOFS ion densities agree well with COSMIC, with a relative bias of ∼ (Formula presented.). The resulting cross-calibration factors, derived from the probability distribution functions, help to eliminate the systematic leveling differences between the data sets, and allow using these data jointly in a large number of ionospheric applications.
KW - data
KW - intercalibration
KW - ionosphere
KW - plasma physics
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85118134179
U2 - 10.1029/2021JA029334
DO - 10.1029/2021JA029334
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85118134179
SN - 2169-9380
VL - 126
JO - Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics
JF - Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics
IS - 10
M1 - e2021JA029334
ER -