Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Land carbon response to positive, zero, and negative CO<sub>2</sub> emissions across Earth system models

  • Abigail L. S. Swann
  • , Charles D. Koven
  • , Cristian Proistosecu
  • , Rosie A. Fisher
  • , Benjamin M. Sanderson
  • , Victor Brovkin
  • , Tomohiro Hajima
  • , Chris D. Jones
  • , Nancy Y. Kiang
  • , David M. Lawrence
  • , Spencer Liddicoat
  • , Hannah Liddy
  • , Anastasia Romanou
  • , Roland Seferian
  • , Lori T. Sentman
  • , Norman J. Steinert
  • , Jerry Tjiputra
  • , Tilo Ziehn
  • University of Washington
  • United States Department of Energy
  • University of Illinois System
  • Max Planck Society
  • University of Hamburg
  • Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science & Technology (JAMSTEC)
  • University of Bristol
  • UK Met Office
  • National Aeronautics and Space Administration
  • Columbia University
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)
  • National Oceanic Atmospheric Admin (NOAA) - USA
  • Norwegian Research Centre (NORCE)
  • Commonwealth Scientific & Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO)

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

Land carbon sinks are responsible for removing about a quarter of anthropogenic CO2 emissions, and make up approximately half of total global carbon sinks. Uncertainty in the response of land carbon sinks to climate and changing atmospheric CO2 are large, and dominate the uncertainty in total carbon sinks under future climate. Understanding the carbon cycle response to net-zero and net-negative emissions has important implications for projecting future climate. Here we characterize the response of land carbon pools and fluxes from ten emissions-driven Earth system models (ESMs) under positive, net-zero, and net-negative CO2 emissions using experiments from the "flat10" model intercomparison. Although there are many differences in simulated land carbon pools and fluxes across models, we find some consistent behavior across ESMs. (1) During the positive emissions phase, carbon is gained on land primarily in vegetation pools. (2) Following net-negative emissions to the point of cumulative zero emissions, carbon is lost from land in tropical latitudes, primarily from vegetation pools, but in mid- and high-latitudes most models show net land carbon gain, primarily in soil pools. (3) Following an extended period of net-zero emissions, a majority of models again show carbon gain in mid- and high-latitudes and vegetation carbon loss in the tropics. Under net-negative emissions the timing of vegetation carbon response relative to peak emissions is relatively consistent across ESMs, but timing of soil carbon response varies widely, implying larger intermodel disagreement associated with responses of soil carbon which tends to have longer timescales relative to vegetation carbon. Our findings highlight that tropical carbon is most likely to be both gained and subsequently lost under positive, zero, declining, and negative emissions, with possible implications for carbon dioxide removal efforts.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1237-1275
Number of pages39
JournalEarth System Dynamics
Volume17
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2026

Keywords

  • Environment simulator jules
  • Climate-change
  • Soil carbon
  • Global carbon
  • Temperature-acclimation
  • Terrestrial biosphere
  • Permafrost carbon
  • Cycle feedbacks
  • Version
  • Photosynthesis

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Land carbon response to positive, zero, and negative CO<sub>2</sub> emissions across Earth system models'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this