Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Modeling the Subsurface Structure of Sunspots

  • H. Moradi
  • , C. Baldner
  • , A. C. Birch
  • , D. C. Braun
  • , R. H. Cameron
  • , T. L. Duvall
  • , L. Gizon
  • , D. Haber
  • , S. M. Hanasoge
  • , B. W. Hindman
  • , J. Jackiewicz
  • , E. Khomenko
  • , R. Komm
  • , P. Rajaguru
  • , M. Rempel
  • , M. Roth
  • , R. Schlichenmaier
  • , H. Schunker
  • , H. C. Spruit
  • , K. G. Strassmeier
  • M. J. Thompson, S. Zharkov
  • Max Planck Institute for Solar System Research
  • Yale University
  • NorthWest Research Associates, Inc.
  • NASA Goddard Space Flight Center
  • University of Colorado Boulder
  • New Mexico State University
  • Instituto de Astrofisica de Canarias
  • National Solar Observatory
  • Indian Institute of Astrophysics
  • Leibniz-Institut fuer Sonnenphysik (KIS)
  • Max Planck Institute for Astrophysics
  • Leibniz Institute for Astrophysics Potsdam
  • National Center for Atmospheric Research
  • University of Sheffield
  • University College London

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

92 Scopus citations

Abstract

While sunspots are easily observed at the solar surface, determining their subsurface structure is not trivial. There are two main hypotheses for the subsurface structure of sunspots: the monolithic model and the cluster model. Local helioseismology is the only means by which we can investigate subphotospheric structure. However, as current linear inversion techniques do not yet allow helioseismology to probe the internal structure with sufficient confidence to distinguish between the monolith and cluster models, the development of physically realistic sunspot models are a priority for helioseismologists. This is because they are not only important indicators of the variety of physical effects that may influence helioseismic inferences in active regions, but they also enable detailed assessments of the validity of helioseismic interpretations through numerical forward modeling. In this article, we provide a critical review of the existing sunspot models and an overview of numerical methods employed to model wave propagation through model sunspots. We then carry out a helioseismic analysis of the sunspot in Active Region 9787 and address the serious inconsistencies uncovered by Gizon et al. (2009a, 2009b). We find that this sunspot is most probably associated with a shallow, positive wave-speed perturbation (unlike the traditional two-layer model) and that travel-time measurements are consistent with a horizontal outflow in the surrounding moat.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-62
Number of pages62
JournalSolar Physics
Volume267
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2010

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Modeling the Subsurface Structure of Sunspots'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this