TY - JOUR
T1 - National Weather Service (NWS) Forecasters’ Perceptions of AI/ML and Its Use in Operational Forecasting
AU - Wirz, Christopher D.
AU - Demuth, Julie L.
AU - Cains, Mariana G.
AU - White, Miranda
AU - Radford, Jacob
AU - Bostrom, Ann
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 American Meteorological Society.
PY - 2024/11
Y1 - 2024/11
N2 - Artificial intelligence and machine learning (AI/ML) have attracted a great deal of attention from the atmospheric science community. The explosion of attention on AI/ML development carries implications for the operational community, prompting questions about how novel AI/ML advancements will translate from research into operations. However, the field lacks empirical evidence on how National Weather Service (NWS) forecasters, as key intended users, perceive AI/ML and its use in operational forecasting. This study addresses this crucial gap through structured interviews conducted with 29 NWS forecasters from October 2021 through July 2023 in which we explored their perceptions of AI/ML in forecasting. We found that forecasters generally prefer the term “machine learning” over “artificial intelligence” and that labeling a product as being AI/ML did not hurt perceptions of the products and made some forecasters more excited about the product. Forecasters also had a wide range of familiarity with AI/ML, and overall, they were (tentatively) open to the use of AI/ML in forecasting. We also provide examples of specific areas related to AI/ML that forecasters are excited or hopeful about and that they are concerned or worried about. One concern that was raised in several ways was that AI/ ML could replace forecasters or remove them from the forecasting process. However, forecasters expressed a widespread and deep commitment to the best possible forecasts and services to uphold the agency mission using whatever tools or products that are available to assist them. Last, we note how forecasters’ perceptions evolved over the course of the study.
AB - Artificial intelligence and machine learning (AI/ML) have attracted a great deal of attention from the atmospheric science community. The explosion of attention on AI/ML development carries implications for the operational community, prompting questions about how novel AI/ML advancements will translate from research into operations. However, the field lacks empirical evidence on how National Weather Service (NWS) forecasters, as key intended users, perceive AI/ML and its use in operational forecasting. This study addresses this crucial gap through structured interviews conducted with 29 NWS forecasters from October 2021 through July 2023 in which we explored their perceptions of AI/ML in forecasting. We found that forecasters generally prefer the term “machine learning” over “artificial intelligence” and that labeling a product as being AI/ML did not hurt perceptions of the products and made some forecasters more excited about the product. Forecasters also had a wide range of familiarity with AI/ML, and overall, they were (tentatively) open to the use of AI/ML in forecasting. We also provide examples of specific areas related to AI/ML that forecasters are excited or hopeful about and that they are concerned or worried about. One concern that was raised in several ways was that AI/ ML could replace forecasters or remove them from the forecasting process. However, forecasters expressed a widespread and deep commitment to the best possible forecasts and services to uphold the agency mission using whatever tools or products that are available to assist them. Last, we note how forecasters’ perceptions evolved over the course of the study.
KW - Artificial intelligence
KW - Communications/ decision making
KW - Machine learning
KW - Operational forecasting
KW - Social Science
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85210539934
U2 - 10.1175/BAMS-D-24-0044.1
DO - 10.1175/BAMS-D-24-0044.1
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85210539934
SN - 0003-0007
VL - 105
SP - E2194-E2215
JO - Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society
JF - Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society
IS - 11
ER -