TY - JOUR
T1 - Neutral Tropical African CO2 Exchange Estimated From Aircraft and Satellite Observations
AU - Gaubert, Benjamin
AU - Stephens, Britton B.
AU - Baker, David F.
AU - Basu, Sourish
AU - Bertolacci, Michael
AU - Bowman, Kevin W.
AU - Buchholz, Rebecca
AU - Chatterjee, Abhishek
AU - Chevallier, Frédéric
AU - Commane, Róisín
AU - Cressie, Noel
AU - Deng, Feng
AU - Jacobs, Nicole
AU - Johnson, Matthew S.
AU - Maksyutov, Shamil S.
AU - McKain, Kathryn
AU - Liu, Junjie
AU - Liu, Zhiqiang
AU - Morgan, Eric
AU - O’Dell, Chris
AU - Philip, Sajeev
AU - Ray, Eric
AU - Schimel, David
AU - Schuh, Andrew
AU - Taylor, Thomas E.
AU - Weir, Brad
AU - van Wees, Dave
AU - Wofsy, Steven C.
AU - Zammit-Mangion, Andrew
AU - Zeng, Ning
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023. American Geophysical Union. All Rights Reserved.
PY - 2023/12
Y1 - 2023/12
N2 - Tropical lands play an important role in the global carbon cycle yet their contribution remains uncertain owing to sparse observations. Satellite observations of atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) have greatly increased spatial coverage over tropical regions, providing the potential for improved estimates of terrestrial fluxes. Despite this advancement, the spread among satellite-based and in-situ atmospheric CO2 flux inversions over northern tropical Africa (NTA), spanning 0–24°N, remains large. Satellite-based estimates of an annual source of 0.8–1.45 PgC yr−1 challenge our understanding of tropical and global carbon cycling. Here, we compare posterior mole fractions from the suite of inversions participating in the Orbiting Carbon Observatory 2 (OCO-2) Version 10 Model Intercomparison Project (v10 MIP) with independent in-situ airborne observations made over the tropical Atlantic Ocean by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) Atmospheric Tomography (ATom) mission during four seasons. We develop emergent constraints on tropical African CO2 fluxes using flux-concentration relationships defined by the model suite. We find an annual flux of 0.14 ± 0.39 PgC yr−1 (mean and standard deviation) for NTA, 2016–2018. The satellite-based flux bias suggests a potential positive concentration bias in OCO-2 B10 and earlier version retrievals over land in NTA during the dry season. Nevertheless, the OCO-2 observations provide improved flux estimates relative to the in situ observing network at other times of year, indicating stronger uptake in NTA during the wet season than the in-situ inversion estimates.
AB - Tropical lands play an important role in the global carbon cycle yet their contribution remains uncertain owing to sparse observations. Satellite observations of atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) have greatly increased spatial coverage over tropical regions, providing the potential for improved estimates of terrestrial fluxes. Despite this advancement, the spread among satellite-based and in-situ atmospheric CO2 flux inversions over northern tropical Africa (NTA), spanning 0–24°N, remains large. Satellite-based estimates of an annual source of 0.8–1.45 PgC yr−1 challenge our understanding of tropical and global carbon cycling. Here, we compare posterior mole fractions from the suite of inversions participating in the Orbiting Carbon Observatory 2 (OCO-2) Version 10 Model Intercomparison Project (v10 MIP) with independent in-situ airborne observations made over the tropical Atlantic Ocean by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) Atmospheric Tomography (ATom) mission during four seasons. We develop emergent constraints on tropical African CO2 fluxes using flux-concentration relationships defined by the model suite. We find an annual flux of 0.14 ± 0.39 PgC yr−1 (mean and standard deviation) for NTA, 2016–2018. The satellite-based flux bias suggests a potential positive concentration bias in OCO-2 B10 and earlier version retrievals over land in NTA during the dry season. Nevertheless, the OCO-2 observations provide improved flux estimates relative to the in situ observing network at other times of year, indicating stronger uptake in NTA during the wet season than the in-situ inversion estimates.
KW - Africa
KW - CO2
KW - NASA ATom
KW - NASA OCO-2
KW - carbon cycle
KW - emergent constraints
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85180460301
U2 - 10.1029/2023GB007804
DO - 10.1029/2023GB007804
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85180460301
SN - 0886-6236
VL - 37
JO - Global Biogeochemical Cycles
JF - Global Biogeochemical Cycles
IS - 12
M1 - e2023GB007804
ER -