Abstract
Appropriate formulation of bulk parameterization of snow growth and evaporation based on observational characteristics of snow particles is presented. The parameterization is compared to that of S. A. Rutledge and P. V. Hobbs and to detailed treatment in which snow particles are assumed to grow or evaporate in each size bin separately. On the contrary to bulk parameterization of rain, snow diffusional growth or evaporation is accurately represented in the suggested bulk formulation, but growth by riming is overpredicted. Integrations of water budget equations in a one-dimensional updraft have shown that quantitative results, e.g., precipitation intensity, cloudwater content, supersaturation with respect to ice, depend on the parameterization scheme employed, which suggests that comparisons of field measurements with parameterized model outputs is usually not straightforward.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 79-92 |
| Number of pages | 14 |
| Journal | Pure and Applied Geophysics |
| Volume | 127 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Mar 1988 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- Snow
- numerical models of clouds
- parameterization of microphysics