On the desirability and feasibility of a global reanalysis of tropical cyclones

Kerry Emanuel, Philippe Caroff, Sandy Delgado, Charles Chip Guard, Mark Guishard, Christopher Hennon, John Knaff, Kenneth R. Knapp, James Kossin, Carl Schreck, Christopher Velden, Jonathan Vigh

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

9 Scopus citations

Abstract

Accurate records of historical tropical cyclones are invaluable for scientific research and risk quantification. Yet most tropical cyclone data were collected in aid of operational forecasting with mixed attention to their use as a climate archive. To remedy this, a workshop was convened in Asheville, North Carolina, on 22–23 May 2017 to explore the feasibility of performing a global reanalysis of tropical cyclones and to lay the foundations for a set of standards for future observations. The workshop was funded by the Bermuda Institute of Ocean Sciences' Risk Prediction Initiative (RPI), a nonprofit organization supported by the risk transfer industry and focused on questions surrounding the quantification of catastrophic risk. Comprehensive, best-state reanalyses of all western North Pacific tropical cyclones during the period of aircraft reconnaissance, 1946–87 were analyzed. This would parallel the ongoing reanalysis of North Atlantic tropical cyclones with the objective of obtaining the best estimate of the state of the cyclone at each time. A comprehensive, best-state reanalysis was done for all basins that utilizes objective state estimation methods to blend all available data. The workshop concluded with detailed discussions of the financial and human resources that would be required to carry out the proposed work.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)427-429
Number of pages3
JournalBulletin of the American Meteorological Society
Volume99
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2018
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'On the desirability and feasibility of a global reanalysis of tropical cyclones'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this