Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

On the Role of Dynamical Uncertainties in the Spread of Arctic Ozone Recovery Projections

  • Samuel Benito-Barca
  • , Marta Abalos
  • , Natalia Calvo
  • , Alvaro de la Cámara
  • , Blanca Ayarzagüena
  • , Gabriel Chiodo
  • , Hideharu Akiyoshi
  • , Fraser Dennison
  • , Patrick Jöckel
  • , Béatrice Josse
  • , Doug Kinnison
  • , Olaf Morgenstern
  • , David Plummer
  • , Timofei Sukhodolov
  • , Yousuke Yamashita
  • , Shingo Watanabe
  • Complutense University
  • National Institute for Environmental Studies of Japan
  • CSIRO
  • University of Melbourne
  • German Aerospace Center
  • Paul Sabatier University
  • National Center for Atmospheric Research
  • National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research
  • University of Canterbury
  • Deutscher Wetterdienst
  • Université Laval and Environment and Climate Change Canada
  • Physikalisch-Meteorologisches Observatorium Davos World Radiation Center
  • Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology
  • Tohoku University

Research output: Contribution to journalLetterpeer-review

Abstract

Arctic ozone is projected to recover over the 21st century in compliance with the Montreal Protocol. Chemistry-climate models show a large spread in recovery rates and future changes in key dynamical features such as the polar vortex and the residual circulation. Here, we quantify the spread in Arctic ozone recovery explained by uncertainties in these dynamical changes, using simulations from the Chemistry-Climate Model Initiative, phases 1 and 2022. About 60% of the spread in projected ozone recovery is attributed to differences in polar vortex trends and about one-third to the intermodel spread in residual circulation trends. Ozone-depleting substances and greenhouse gas-driven global warming contribute similarly to the spread in ozone recovery, although uncertainties in dynamical trends primarily affect the warming component. While dynamical changes clearly separate the simulated ozone recovery among different models, the large variability in the Arctic stratosphere precludes establishing an observational constraint on future ozone recovery.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere2025GL120212
JournalGeophysical Research Letters
Volume53
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - May 28 2026
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Arctic ozone recovery
  • Brewer-Dobson circulation
  • chemistry-climate models
  • polar vortex

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'On the Role of Dynamical Uncertainties in the Spread of Arctic Ozone Recovery Projections'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this