Ozone photochemistry in fresh biomass burning smoke over the United States

  • Lixu Jin
  • , Matthew M. Coggon
  • , Wade Permar
  • , Julieta F. Juncosa Calahorrano
  • , Brett B. Palm
  • , Georgios I. Gkatzelis
  • , Michael A. Robinson
  • , Ilann Bourgeois
  • , Samuel R. Hall
  • , Jeff Peischl
  • , Kirk Ullmann
  • , Joel A. Thornton
  • , Carsten Warneke
  • , Frank Flocke
  • , Emily V. Fischer
  • , Robert J. Yokelson
  • , Lu Hu

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

The first 5 hours of aging in biomass burning plumes can strongly affect ozone photochemistry. We examine how volatile organic compounds (VOCs), nitrogen oxides, and nitrous acid influence hydroxyl radical, ozone, and peroxyacetyl nitrate (PAN) based on three aircraft campaigns over the United States. Our analyses reveal variable, highly elevated hydroxyl radical concentrations in the first 2 hours, resulting in evident fire-to-fire variability in VOCs oxidation and in ozone and PAN production. About 40 to 70% of the variability is explained by chemical aging. Ozone production in the plumes is usually VOC-limited for the first 2 hours and then nitrogen oxide limited downwind. Box model results for hydroxyl radical, ozone, and most VOCs, using the full, explicit Master Chemical Mechanism (MCM) mechanism, suggest no major gaps in the current best knowledge of gas-phase chemistry. However, the MCM sometimes overestimates PAN due to underestimated nitrogen oxide sinks. GEOS-Chem, a widely used chemical transport model with a reduced mechanism, generally underperforms because of incomplete VOC representation. We identify these critical pathways to guide future model development.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbereads2157
Pages (from-to)1-15
Number of pages15
JournalScience advances
Volume12
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 6 2026
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Ozone photochemistry in fresh biomass burning smoke over the United States'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this