PACMan2: Next Steps in Proposal Review Management

Louis Gregory Strolger, Jamila Pegues, Tegan King, Nathan Miles, Michelle Ramsahoye, Keith Ceruti Ii, Brett Blacker, I. Neill Reid

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

With the start of a new Great Observatories era, there is renewed concern that the demand for these forefront facilities, through proposal pressure, will exceed conventional peer-review management’s capacity for ensuring an unbiased and efficient selection. There is need for new methods, strategies, and tools to facilitate those reviews. Here, we describe PACMan2, an updated tool for proposal review management that utilizes machine-learning models and techniques to topically categorize proposals and reviewers, to match proposals to reviewers, and to facilitate proposal assignments, mitigating some conflicts of interest. We find that the classifier has cross-validation accuracy of 80.0% ± 2.2% on proposals for time on the Hubble Space Telescope and the James Webb Space Telescope.

Original languageEnglish
Article number215
JournalAstronomical Journal
Volume165
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2023
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'PACMan2: Next Steps in Proposal Review Management'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this