Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

PMIP4-CMIP6: the contribution of the Paleoclimate Modelling Intercomparison Project to CMIP6

  • Masa Kageyama
  • , Pascale Braconnot
  • , Sandy P. Harrison
  • , Alan M. Haywood
  • , Johann Jungclaus
  • , Bette L. Otto-Bliesner
  • , Jean Yves Peterschmitt
  • , Ayako Abe-Ouchi
  • , Samuel Albani
  • , Patrick J. Bartlein
  • , Chris Brierley
  • , Michel Crucifix
  • , Aisling Dolan
  • , Laura Fernandez-Donado
  • , Hubertus Fischer
  • , Peter O. Hopcroft
  • , Ruza F. Ivanovic
  • , Fabrice Lambert
  • , Dan J. Lunt
  • , Natalie M. Mahowald
  • W. Richard Peltier, Steven J. Phipps, Didier M. Roche, Gavin A. Schmidt, Lev Tarasov, Paul J. Valdes, Qiong Zhang, Tianjun Zhou
  • Université Versailles St-Quentin
  • University of Reading
  • University of Leeds
  • Max Planck Institute for Meteorology
  • National Center for Atmospheric Research
  • The University of Tokyo
  • Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology
  • University of Cologne
  • University of Oregon
  • University College London
  • Université catholique de Louvain
  • Complutense University
  • University of Bern
  • University of Bristol
  • Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile
  • Cornell University
  • University of Toronto
  • University of Tasmania
  • Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
  • Columbia University
  • Memorial University of Newfoundland
  • Stockholm University
  • CAS - Institute of Atmospheric Physics

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

21 Scopus citations

Abstract

The goal of the Palaeoclimate Modelling Intercomparison Project (PMIP) is to understand the response of the climate system to changes in different climate forcings and to feedbacks. Through comparison with observations of the environmental impacts of these climate changes, or with climate reconstructions based on physical, chemical or biological records, PMIP also addresses the issue of how well state-of-the-art models simulate climate changes. Palaeoclimate states are radically different from those of the recent past documented by the instrumental record and thus provide an out-of-sample test of the models used for future climate projections and a way to assess whether they have the correct sensitivity to forcings and feedbacks. Five distinctly different periods have been selected as focus for the core palaeoclimate experiments that are designed to contribute to the objectives of the sixth phase of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP6). This manuscript describes the motivation for the choice of these periods and the design of the numerical experiments, with a focus upon their novel features compared to the experiments performed in previous phases of PMIP and CMIP as well as the benefits of common analyses of the models across multiple climate states. It also describes the information needed to document each experiment and the model outputs required for analysis and benchmarking.

Original languageEnglish
JournalGeoscientific Model Development
Volume11
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 2016
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'PMIP4-CMIP6: the contribution of the Paleoclimate Modelling Intercomparison Project to CMIP6'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this