TY - JOUR
T1 - PMIP4-CMIP6
T2 - the contribution of the Paleoclimate Modelling Intercomparison Project to CMIP6
AU - Kageyama, Masa
AU - Braconnot, Pascale
AU - Harrison, Sandy P.
AU - Haywood, Alan M.
AU - Jungclaus, Johann
AU - Otto-Bliesner, Bette L.
AU - Peterschmitt, Jean Yves
AU - Abe-Ouchi, Ayako
AU - Albani, Samuel
AU - Bartlein, Patrick J.
AU - Brierley, Chris
AU - Crucifix, Michel
AU - Dolan, Aisling
AU - Fernandez-Donado, Laura
AU - Fischer, Hubertus
AU - Hopcroft, Peter O.
AU - Ivanovic, Ruza F.
AU - Lambert, Fabrice
AU - Lunt, Dan J.
AU - Mahowald, Natalie M.
AU - Richard Peltier, W.
AU - Phipps, Steven J.
AU - Roche, Didier M.
AU - Schmidt, Gavin A.
AU - Tarasov, Lev
AU - Valdes, Paul J.
AU - Zhang, Qiong
AU - Zhou, Tianjun
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© Author(s) 2016.
PY - 2016
Y1 - 2016
N2 - The goal of the Palaeoclimate Modelling Intercomparison Project (PMIP) is to understand the response of the climate system to changes in different climate forcings and to feedbacks. Through comparison with observations of the environmental impacts of these climate changes, or with climate reconstructions based on physical, chemical or biological records, PMIP also addresses the issue of how well state-of-the-art models simulate climate changes. Palaeoclimate states are radically different from those of the recent past documented by the instrumental record and thus provide an out-of-sample test of the models used for future climate projections and a way to assess whether they have the correct sensitivity to forcings and feedbacks. Five distinctly different periods have been selected as focus for the core palaeoclimate experiments that are designed to contribute to the objectives of the sixth phase of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP6). This manuscript describes the motivation for the choice of these periods and the design of the numerical experiments, with a focus upon their novel features compared to the experiments performed in previous phases of PMIP and CMIP as well as the benefits of common analyses of the models across multiple climate states. It also describes the information needed to document each experiment and the model outputs required for analysis and benchmarking.
AB - The goal of the Palaeoclimate Modelling Intercomparison Project (PMIP) is to understand the response of the climate system to changes in different climate forcings and to feedbacks. Through comparison with observations of the environmental impacts of these climate changes, or with climate reconstructions based on physical, chemical or biological records, PMIP also addresses the issue of how well state-of-the-art models simulate climate changes. Palaeoclimate states are radically different from those of the recent past documented by the instrumental record and thus provide an out-of-sample test of the models used for future climate projections and a way to assess whether they have the correct sensitivity to forcings and feedbacks. Five distinctly different periods have been selected as focus for the core palaeoclimate experiments that are designed to contribute to the objectives of the sixth phase of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP6). This manuscript describes the motivation for the choice of these periods and the design of the numerical experiments, with a focus upon their novel features compared to the experiments performed in previous phases of PMIP and CMIP as well as the benefits of common analyses of the models across multiple climate states. It also describes the information needed to document each experiment and the model outputs required for analysis and benchmarking.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85033397738
U2 - 10.5194/gmd-2016-106
DO - 10.5194/gmd-2016-106
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85033397738
SN - 1991-959X
VL - 11
JO - Geoscientific Model Development
JF - Geoscientific Model Development
IS - 3
ER -