Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Predicting September Arctic Sea Ice: A Multimodel Seasonal Skill Comparison

  • Mitchell Bushuk
  • , Sahara Ali
  • , David A. Bailey
  • , Qing Bao
  • , Lauriane Batté
  • , Uma S. Bhatt
  • , Edward Blanchard-Wrigglesworth
  • , Ed Blockley
  • , Gavin Cawley
  • , Junhwa Chi
  • , François Counillon
  • , Philippe Goulet Coulombe
  • , Richard I. Cullather
  • , Francis X. Diebold
  • , Arlan Dirkson
  • , Eleftheria Exarchou
  • , Maximilian Göbel
  • , William Gregory
  • , Virginie Guemas
  • , Lawrence Hamilton
  • Bian He, Sean Horvath, Monica Ionita, Jennifer E. Kay, Eliot Kim, Noriaki Kimura, Dmitri Kondrashov, Zachary M. Labe, Woo Sung Lee, Younjoo J. Lee, Cuihua Li, Xuewei Li, Yongcheng Lin, Yanyun Liu, Wieslaw Maslowski, François Massonnet, Walter N. Meier, William J. Merryfield, Hannah Myint, Juan C. Acosta Navarro, Alek Petty, Fangli Qiao, David Schröder, Axel Schweiger, Qi Shu, Michael Sigmond, Michael Steele, Julienne Stroeve, Nico Sun, Steffen Tietsche, Michel Tsamados, Keguang Wang, Jianwu Wang, Wanqiu Wang, Yiguo Wang, Yun Wang, James Williams, Qinghua Yang, Xiaojun Yuan, Jinlun Zhang, Yongfei Zhang
  • National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
  • University of Maryland, College Park
  • National Center for Atmospheric Research
  • CAS - Institute of Atmospheric Physics
  • Météo France
  • University of Alaska Fairbanks
  • University of Washington
  • Met Office
  • University of East Anglia
  • Pukyong National University
  • Bjerknes Centre for Climate Research
  • Université du Québec à Montréal
  • NASA Goddard Space Flight Center
  • University of Pennsylvania
  • Université Laval and Environment and Climate Change Canada
  • Barcelona Supercomputing Centre
  • Bocconi University
  • Princeton University
  • Paul Sabatier University
  • University of New Hampshire
  • University of Colorado Boulder
  • Alfred Wegener Institute - Helmholtz Centre for Polar and Marine Research
  • Stefan Cel Mare University
  • The University of Tokyo
  • University of California at Los Angeles
  • Naval Postgraduate School
  • Columbia University
  • Dalian University of Technology
  • Sun Yat-Sen University
  • Inc.
  • Université catholique de Louvain
  • European Commission Joint Research Centre Institute
  • Ministry of Natural Resources of the People's Republic of China
  • University of Reading
  • Applied Physics Laboratory
  • University of Manitoba
  • CryosphereComputing.com
  • European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts
  • University College London
  • Norwegian Meteorological Institute
  • NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

32 Scopus citations

Abstract

This study quantifies the state of the art in the rapidly growing field of seasonal Arctic sea ice prediction. A novel multimodel dataset of retrospective seasonal predictions of September Arctic sea ice is created and analyzed, consisting of community contributions from 17 statistical models and 17 dynamical models. Prediction skill is compared over the period 2001–20 for predictions of pan-Arctic sea ice extent (SIE), regional SIE, and local sea ice concentration (SIC) initialized on 1 June, 1 July, 1 August, and 1 September. This diverse set of statistical and dynamical models can individually predict linearly detrended pan-Arctic SIE anomalies with skill, and a multimodel median prediction has correlation coefficients of 0.79, 0.86, 0.92, and 0.99 at these respective initialization times. Regional SIE predictions have similar skill to pan-Arctic predictions in the Alaskan and Siberian regions, whereas regional skill is lower in the Canadian, Atlantic, and central Arctic sectors. The skill of dynamical and statistical models is generally comparable for pan-Arctic SIE, whereas dynamical models outperform their statistical counterparts for regional and local predictions. The prediction systems are found to provide the most value added relative to basic reference forecasts in the extreme SIE years of 1996, 2007, and 2012. SIE prediction errors do not show clear trends over time, suggesting that there has been minimal change in inherent sea ice predictability over the satellite era. Overall, this study demonstrates that there are bright prospects for skillful operational predictions of September sea ice at least 3 months in advance. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: The observed decline of Arctic sea ice extent has created an emerging need for predictions of sea ice on seasonal time scales. This study provides a comparison of September Arctic sea ice seasonal prediction skill across a diverse set of dynamical and statistical prediction models, quantifying the state of the art in the rapidly growing sea ice prediction research community. We find that both dynamical and statistical models can skillfully predict September Arctic sea ice 0–3 months in advance on pan-Arctic, regional, and local spatial scales. Our results demonstrate that there are bright prospects for skillful operational seasonal predictions of Arctic sea ice and highlight a number of crucial prediction system design aspects to guide future improvements.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)E1170-E1203
JournalBulletin of the American Meteorological Society
Volume105
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2024
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Arctic
  • Climate prediction
  • General circulation
  • Model evaluation/
  • Sea ice
  • Statistical
  • models
  • performance
  • techniques

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Predicting September Arctic Sea Ice: A Multimodel Seasonal Skill Comparison'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this