TY - JOUR
T1 - Research on Emissions, Air quality, Climate, and Cooking Technologies in Northern Ghana (REACCTING)
T2 - Study rationale and protocol
AU - Dickinson, Katherine L.
AU - Kanyomse, Ernest
AU - Piedrahita, Ricardo
AU - Coffey, Evan
AU - Rivera, Isaac J.
AU - Adoctor, James
AU - Alirigia, Rex
AU - Muvandimwe, Didier
AU - Dove, Mackenzie
AU - Dukic, Vanja
AU - Hayden, Mary H.
AU - Diaz-Sanchez, David
AU - Abisiba, Adoctor Victor
AU - Anaseba, Dominic
AU - Hagar, Yolanda
AU - Masson, Nicholas
AU - Monaghan, Andrew
AU - Titiati, Atsu
AU - Steinhoff, Daniel F.
AU - Hsu, Yueh Ya
AU - Kaspar, Rachael
AU - Brooks, Bre'Anna
AU - Hodgson, Abraham
AU - Hannigan, Michael
AU - Oduro, Abraham Rexford
AU - Wiedinmyer, Christine
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2015 Dickinson et al.; licensee BioMed Central.
PY - 2015/12/12
Y1 - 2015/12/12
N2 - Background: Cooking over open fires using solid fuels is both common practice throughout much of the world and widely recognized to contribute to human health, environmental, and social problems. The public health burden of household air pollution includes an estimated four million premature deaths each year. To be effective and generate useful insight into potential solutions, cookstove intervention studies must select cooking technologies that are appropriate for local socioeconomic conditions and cooking culture, and include interdisciplinary measurement strategies along a continuum of outcomes. Methods/Design: REACCTING (Research on Emissions, Air quality, Climate, and Cooking Technologies in Northern Ghana) is an ongoing interdisciplinary randomized cookstove intervention study in the Kassena-Nankana District of Northern Ghana. The study tests two types of biomass burning stoves that have the potential to meet local cooking needs and represent different "rungs" in the cookstove technology ladder: a locally-made low-tech rocket stove and the imported, highly efficient Philips gasifier stove. Intervention households were randomized into four different groups, three of which received different combinations of two improved stoves, while the fourth group serves as a control for the duration of the study. Diverse measurements assess different points along the causal chain linking the intervention to final outcomes of interest. We assess stove use and cooking behavior, cooking emissions, household air pollution and personal exposure, health burden, and local to regional air quality. Integrated analysis and modeling will tackle a range of interdisciplinary science questions, including examining ambient exposures among the regional population, assessing how those exposures might change with different technologies and behaviors, and estimating the comparative impact of local behavior and technological changes versus regional climate variability and change on local air quality and health outcomes. Discussion: REACCTING is well-poised to generate useful data on the impact of a cookstove intervention on a wide range of outcomes. By comparing different technologies side by side and employing an interdisciplinary approach to study this issue from multiple perspectives, this study may help to inform future efforts to improve health and quality of life for populations currently relying on open fires for their cooking needs.
AB - Background: Cooking over open fires using solid fuels is both common practice throughout much of the world and widely recognized to contribute to human health, environmental, and social problems. The public health burden of household air pollution includes an estimated four million premature deaths each year. To be effective and generate useful insight into potential solutions, cookstove intervention studies must select cooking technologies that are appropriate for local socioeconomic conditions and cooking culture, and include interdisciplinary measurement strategies along a continuum of outcomes. Methods/Design: REACCTING (Research on Emissions, Air quality, Climate, and Cooking Technologies in Northern Ghana) is an ongoing interdisciplinary randomized cookstove intervention study in the Kassena-Nankana District of Northern Ghana. The study tests two types of biomass burning stoves that have the potential to meet local cooking needs and represent different "rungs" in the cookstove technology ladder: a locally-made low-tech rocket stove and the imported, highly efficient Philips gasifier stove. Intervention households were randomized into four different groups, three of which received different combinations of two improved stoves, while the fourth group serves as a control for the duration of the study. Diverse measurements assess different points along the causal chain linking the intervention to final outcomes of interest. We assess stove use and cooking behavior, cooking emissions, household air pollution and personal exposure, health burden, and local to regional air quality. Integrated analysis and modeling will tackle a range of interdisciplinary science questions, including examining ambient exposures among the regional population, assessing how those exposures might change with different technologies and behaviors, and estimating the comparative impact of local behavior and technological changes versus regional climate variability and change on local air quality and health outcomes. Discussion: REACCTING is well-poised to generate useful data on the impact of a cookstove intervention on a wide range of outcomes. By comparing different technologies side by side and employing an interdisciplinary approach to study this issue from multiple perspectives, this study may help to inform future efforts to improve health and quality of life for populations currently relying on open fires for their cooking needs.
KW - Cookstoves
KW - Global health
KW - Household air pollution
KW - Randomized intervention study
KW - Study protocol
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/84928652664
U2 - 10.1186/s12889-015-1414-1
DO - 10.1186/s12889-015-1414-1
M3 - Article
C2 - 25885780
AN - SCOPUS:84928652664
SN - 1471-2458
VL - 15
JO - BMC Public Health
JF - BMC Public Health
IS - 1
M1 - 126
ER -