Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Results of the third Marine Ice Sheet Model Intercomparison Project (MISMIP+)

  • Stephen L. Cornford
  • , Helene Seroussi
  • , Xylar S. Asay-Davis
  • , G. Hilmar Gudmundsson
  • , Rob Arthern
  • , Chris Borstad
  • , Julia Christmann
  • , Thiago DIas Dos Santos
  • , Johannes Feldmann
  • , Daniel Goldberg
  • , Matthew J. Hoffman
  • , Angelika Humbert
  • , Thomas Kleiner
  • , Gunter Leguy
  • , William H. Lipscomb
  • , Nacho Merino
  • , Gael Durand
  • , Mathieu Morlighem
  • , David Pollard
  • , Martin Rückamp
  • C. Rosie Williams, Hongju Yu
  • Swansea University
  • Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology
  • Los Alamos National Laboratory
  • Northumbria University
  • British Antarctic Survey
  • Montana State University
  • Alfred Wegener Institute - Helmholtz Centre for Polar and Marine Research
  • University of California at Irvine
  • Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul
  • Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research
  • University of Edinburgh
  • University of Bremen
  • National Center for Atmospheric Research
  • Université Grenoble Alpes
  • Pennsylvania State University

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

82 Scopus citations

Abstract

We present the result of the third Marine Ice Sheet Model Intercomparison Project, MISMIP+. MISMIP+ is intended to be a benchmark for ice-flow models which include fast sliding marine ice streams and floating ice shelves and in particular a treatment of viscous stress that is sufficient to model buttressing, where upstream ice flow is restrained by a downstream ice shelf. A set of idealized experiments first tests that models are able to maintain a steady state with the grounding line located on a retrograde slope due to buttressing and then explore scenarios where a reduction in that buttressing causes ice stream acceleration, thinning, and grounding line retreat. The majority of participating models passed the first test and then produced similar responses to the loss of buttressing. We find that the most important distinction between models in this particular type of simulation is in the treatment of sliding at the bed, with other distinctions - notably the difference between the simpler and more complete treatments of englacial stress but also the differences between numerical methods - taking a secondary role.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2283-2301
Number of pages19
JournalCryosphere
Volume14
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 21 2020
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Results of the third Marine Ice Sheet Model Intercomparison Project (MISMIP+)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this