Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Setting the Standard: Recommended Practices for Data Preprocessing in Data-Driven Climate Prediction

  • Jason C. Furtado
  • , Maria J. Molina
  • , Marybeth C. Arcodia
  • , Weston Anderson
  • , Tom Beucler
  • , John A. Callahan
  • , Laura M. Ciasto
  • , Vittorio A. Gensini
  • , Michelle L’heureux
  • , Kathleen Pegion
  • , Jhayron S. Pérez-Carrasquilla
  • , Maike Sonnewald
  • , Ken Takahashi
  • , Baoqiang Xiang
  • , Brian G. Zimmerman
  • University of Oklahoma
  • University of Maryland, College Park
  • Colorado State University
  • University of Lausanne
  • National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
  • Northern Illinois University
  • University of California at Davis
  • Instituto Geofísico del Perú
  • University Corporation of Atmospheric Research
  • Macquarie

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI)—and specifically machine learning (ML)—applications for climate prediction across time scales are proliferating quickly. The emergence of these methods prompts a revisit to the impact of data preprocessing, a topic familiar to the climate community, as more traditional statistical models work with relatively small sample sizes. Indeed, the skill and confidence in the forecasts produced by data-driven models are directly influenced by the quality of the datasets and how they are treated during model development, yielding the colloquialism, “garbage in, garbage out.” As such, this article establishes protocols for the proper preprocessing of input data for AI/ML models designed for climate prediction (i.e., subseasonal-to-decadal and longer time scales). The three aims are to 1) educate researchers, developers, and end users on the effects that data preprocessing has on climate prediction; 2) provide recommended practices for data preprocessing for such applications; and 3) empower end users to decipher whether the models they are using are properly designed for their objectives. Specific topics covered include creating (standardized) anomalies, dealing with nonstationarity and the spatiotemporally correlated nature of climate data, and handling of extreme values and variables with potentially complex distributions. Case studies will illustrate how using different preprocessing techniques can produce different predictions from the same model, which can create confusion and decrease confidence in the overall process. Ultimately, implementing the recommended practices set forth in this article will enhance the robustness and transparency of AI/ML in climate prediction studies. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: With the rapid expansion of artificial intelligence (AI) in atmospheric science, the need for high-quality, properly prepared data for input into AI/ML models is important. In this article, we offer several recommended steps to properly preprocess input data for AI models used for climate predictions (i.e., time scale ranging from few weeks to many years). Among other topics, we discuss appropriate ways to calculate departures (or anomalies) from data that vary in time and space, how to handle large trends, and what to do with extreme values. We then conduct two case studies to illustrate how using different techniques for preprocessing can produce different predictions from the same model. Ultimately, following these recommendations will help make such studies more transparent, reproducible, and trustworthy.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)E1386-E1401
JournalBulletin of the American Meteorological Society
Volume107
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2026
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Artificial intelligence
  • Climate prediction
  • Machine learning
  • Statistical techniques

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Setting the Standard: Recommended Practices for Data Preprocessing in Data-Driven Climate Prediction'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this