Societal Debates About Emerging Genetic Technologies: Toward a Science of Public Engagement

Christopher D. Wirz, Dietram A. Scheufele, Dominique Brossard

Research output: Contribution to journalEditorial

27 Scopus citations

Abstract

Gene editing is an inherently wicked problem with no single right answer and no group uniquely positioned to decide this answer. We discuss the intricacies of the debates surrounding both plant and human applications of gene editing. Specifically, we demonstrate how one technology has developed into two separate context-driven debates within the scientific community with seemingly contradictory perspectives of ideal outcomes. Resolving these debates will require a culture of civic science that focuses on early and ongoing engagement with different publics that is not just done on science’s terms. We provide recommendations for how both bench and social scientists should approach these issues moving forward. We also give a brief review of the research and commentaries included in this special issue of Environmental Communication on gene editing.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)859-864
Number of pages6
JournalEnvironmental Communication
Volume14
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2 2020

Keywords

  • Civic science
  • gene editing
  • science communication

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Societal Debates About Emerging Genetic Technologies: Toward a Science of Public Engagement'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this