Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Taking climate model evaluation to the next level

  • Veronika Eyring
  • , Peter M. Cox
  • , Gregory M. Flato
  • , Peter J. Gleckler
  • , Gab Abramowitz
  • , Peter Caldwell
  • , William D. Collins
  • , Bettina K. Gier
  • , Alex D. Hall
  • , Forrest M. Hoffman
  • , George C. Hurtt
  • , Alexandra Jahn
  • , Chris D. Jones
  • , Stephen A. Klein
  • , John P. Krasting
  • , Lester Kwiatkowski
  • , Ruth Lorenz
  • , Eric Maloney
  • , Gerald A. Meehl
  • , Angeline G. Pendergrass
  • Robert Pincus, Alex C. Ruane, Joellen L. Russell, Benjamin M. Sanderson, Benjamin D. Santer, Steven C. Sherwood, Isla R. Simpson, Ronald J. Stouffer, Mark S. Williamson
  • German Aerospace Center
  • University of Bremen
  • University of Exeter
  • Université Laval and Environment and Climate Change Canada
  • Lawrence Livermore Natl. Laboratory
  • University of New South Wales
  • Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
  • University of California at Berkeley
  • University of California at Los Angeles
  • Oak Ridge National Laboratory
  • University of Tennessee, Knoxville
  • University of Maryland, College Park
  • University of Colorado Boulder
  • Met Office
  • National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
  • Ecole Polytechnique
  • Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich
  • National Center for Atmospheric Research
  • NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies
  • University of Arizona

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

613 Scopus citations

Abstract

Earth system models are complex and represent a large number of processes, resulting in a persistent spread across climate projections for a given future scenario. Owing to different model performances against observations and the lack of independence among models, there is now evidence that giving equal weight to each available model projection is suboptimal. This Perspective discusses newly developed tools that facilitate a more rapid and comprehensive evaluation of model simulations with observations, process-based emergent constraints that are a promising way to focus evaluation on the observations most relevant to climate projections, and advanced methods for model weighting. These approaches are needed to distil the most credible information on regional climate changes, impacts, and risks for stakeholders and policy-makers.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)102-110
Number of pages9
JournalNature Climate Change
Volume9
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2019
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Taking climate model evaluation to the next level'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this